Laserfiche WebLink
im6ETTim-RyAti kc. GR Job # 18200384 <br /> SWRCB,January 2002 Page 4 of 4 <br /> 8.FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested <br /> Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer <br /> Other(specify) <br /> Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic <br /> Other(s eci <br /> Test Equipment Used: ]neon t2uipment Resolution: 0.0001 <br /> _s. s:. 3 Fill Sum # 91 Fill Sump# 87.2 Fill Sump# Fill Sum # <br /> Sump Diameter: 42" 42" <br /> Sump Depth: 53" 53" <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of <br /> bottom bottom <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest 30" 30" <br /> Electrical Penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to <br /> Fair Fair <br /> testing: <br /> Portion of Sump Tested(1) 34" 34" <br /> Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and 15 mins 15 mins- <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: 11:36 AM 11:36 AM <br /> Initial Reading(Ri): 4.8275 5.3748 <br /> Test End Time: 11:51 11:51 <br /> Final Reading(Rf) 4.8270 5.3745 <br /> Test duration: 15 Mins 15 Mins <br /> Change in Reading(Rf-Ri): 0.0005 0.0003 <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 <br /> Test Results: Fail EQ Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail <br /> Is there a sensor in the sum ? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No <br /> Does the sensor alarm when <br /> either product or water is Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and ye No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommend follow-up for failed tests) <br />