Laserfiche WebLink
based on various considerations,such as safety,cost,geographical constraints,the appropriateness of a particular <br /> requirement based on site-specific considerations,or other factors consistent with engineering principles. <br /> Unlike impracticability claims,where cost cannot be the sole consideration(69 FR 29729,May 25,2004),an owner or <br /> operator may consider cost as one of the factors in deciding whether to deviate from a particular requirement,but the <br /> alternative provided must achieve environmental protection equivalent to the required measure(67 FR 47095,July 17, <br /> 2002). Facilities have the opportunity to reduce costs by alternative methods if they can maintain environmental <br /> protection(67 FR 47056,July 17,2002). <br /> The description should provide the details of how the procedures are implemented at the facility,including specific <br /> information on the steps involved in each activity,required equipment,personnel training,and records that need to be <br /> maintained to document and verify implementation. For the required documentation, refer to chapter 3, section 3.4.2 <br /> "SPCC Plan Documentation". The CUPA does not gel input, this is reserved for the US EPA. A PE must review the <br /> selection and implementation of environmentally equivalent measures and certify them as being consistent with good <br /> engineering practice. <br /> Feel free to contact me with any questions.Since the US EPA would have the authority to reject or approve the <br /> environmental equivalence you can always contact Region 9,contact info can be found here. <br /> Thankyou, <br /> Cesar Ruvalcaba <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> Environmental Health Specialist <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Ave <br /> Stockton,CA 95205 <br /> $ (209)953-62131 A (209)464-01381 ® cruvalcab@Psieov.ore <br /> ="°41SAN>IOADUIN <br /> —COUNTY— <br /> Gremn<n grows hero <br /> 2 <br />