My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
2448
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544300
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2019 4:12:50 PM
Creation date
4/2/2019 3:23:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544300
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003855
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SHELL) 68153
STREET_NUMBER
2448
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05814001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2448 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�`_�7E OFCALIFORNIA <br /> GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN,Governor <br /> '�C.Ak-ORN W 1`156GIONAL WATER--jUALITY CONTROL — 1. <br /> BOARD _., <br /> ' ENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 ROUTIER ROAD <br /> SACRAMENTO,CA 95827-3098 <br /> �r <br /> SEP 2 1988 <br /> 1 September 1988 <br /> ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Mr. Gregory Fletcher <br /> Kayo oil Company <br /> P. <br /> Lodi, CA 95241 <br /> REVIEW OF GROUND WATER MONITORING REPORT FOR 800'. EAST HIGHWAY 12 , <br /> LODI <br /> We recently received and reviewed yoz�r revised quarterly ground <br /> water monitoring report. As we requested by phone on 8 July <br /> 1988, a revised report was to be prepared in which the problems <br /> we discussed would be corrected. The revised report still does <br /> not resolve the problems of the original (which was two months <br /> overdue) . Our hope is that, by bringing our concerns about this . <br /> monitoring report to your attention, similar errors will be <br /> avoided in future monitoring reports. <br /> i <br /> Our specific comments about the report are as follows: <br /> - Many monitoring wells were not sampled because they were dry <br /> or there were obstructions in the wells (pumps) . This <br /> rinformation is still missing from the report text and could <br /> - information <br /> ascertained-°by �readiny tie cra_-n_of_-_ustodv_forms. <br /> Your plots of benzene concentration in water are misleading <br /> for two reasons: (1) Benzene concentration in ground water <br /> is not a 3-dimensional parameter, and (2) The values <br /> assumed for benzene when free product is present are not <br /> accurate (Benzene solubility in water is 1780 mg/1) . Your <br /> own data shows benzene contamination in water in millions of <br /> ppb. <br /> The statement about how you will treat ND values for <br /> computer modeling and graphs is wrong. It either suggests <br /> that an attempt is being made to deliberately present <br /> misleading data, or that whoever is responsible does not <br /> grasp the concept of detection limits. Samples that showed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.