Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> SITE CLOSURE EVALUATION REPORT <br /> Ultramar Station No. 696 <br /> 2448 West Kettlennan Lane <br /> Lodi, Califomia <br /> Delta Project No. D093-916 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 7.0 RATIONALE FOR CLOSURE <br /> The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins <br /> (WQCP) dated December 1994, by the CRWQCB contains guidelines for evaluating sites for regulatory <br /> closure. The WQCP states in Chapter 4, Section 9 (g) that ground water cleanup levels are to be based <br /> ' on background concentrations, water quality objectives, risk to human health and the environment, and <br /> the technologic and economic feasibility of attaining background concentrations. Only two of the ground <br /> ' water monitoring wells (MW-24 and MW-25) at the site have contained detectable concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons since November 1992. No ground water samples collected at the site since <br /> ' August 1994 have contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons, indicating that <br /> background concentrations have been attained and no further ground water remediation is needed. <br /> The WQCP states in Chapter 4, Section 9 0) that soil cleanup levels are to be based on background <br /> concentrations of the individual constituents unless background levels are technologically or economically <br /> infeasible. It further states that where background concentrations are infeasible to achieve, soil cleanup <br /> ' levels are to be established to ensure that remaining constituents of concern will not cause ground water <br /> to exceed the applicable ground water cleanup standards or pose a threat to human health or the <br /> environment. It would appear that Ultramar and the previous site owners have expended considerable <br /> ' resources and have utilized the best available technology to remove significant concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons from the soil underlying the site; however,reducing concentrations of petroleum <br /> ' hydrocarbons in soil to background concentrations does not appear to be economically feasible. Because <br /> the site is capped by asphalt pavement, the petroleum hydrocarbons which remain in soil are present at <br /> ' depths of approximately 20 feet or greater, and the concentrations of benzene and toluene in soil are less <br /> than analytical detection limit levels, it is not likely that the petroleum hydrocarbons which remain would <br /> ' pose a significant threat to human health. Since naturally occurring biological degradation of petroleum <br /> will continue to reduce the cbncentration of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, it is not likely that significant <br /> ' impacts to ground water quality will.occur in the future.. <br /> The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act in Section 13267(b) provides that the Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Boards may require dischargers to submit technical or monitoring reports "provided that <br /> RPT134.S!S <br />