Laserfiche WebLink
C. ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST (Completed by Cily staff) <br /> This checklist shall be completed, and/or independently reviewed and authorized, by the City of Stockton Community <br /> Development Department/Planning Division pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15063. <br /> The following questions are intended to provide a brief environmental evaluation of the proposed project in order to identify <br /> any potentially significant adverse environmental impacts which may be caused by the project or which may affect the <br /> Project site. For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that any feasible mitigation measures identified in the Initial <br /> Study,which have been agreed to pursuant to a"Mitigation Agreement"with the City of Stockton,will be incorporated into <br /> the project. <br /> In the first assessment category, "Potentially Significant", a "No" response indicates that the project (with mitigation <br /> measures, if applicable) will not have, or be subject to any significant effects on the environment. A "Yes" response <br /> indicates that the project may/will have a significant adverse effect, either directly or indirectly, even if partially mitigated. <br /> In the second category, "Mitigation Incorporated", a"Yes"response indicates that the project will fully or partially mitigate <br /> any adverse effects by incorporating proposed and/or required mitigation measures. A "No" response indicates that <br /> mitigation measures have not been agreed to, are infeasible, or are not necessary. <br /> A narrative discussion of all"Yes"responses and any clarifications to"No"responses and/or the scope of work for an EIR, <br /> if required, shall be provided in the section following this checklist (Section D-"Discussion of Environmental Evaluation <br /> and Mitigation Measures and/or EIR Scope of Work"). <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentially Mitigation <br /> Significant Incorporated <br /> Yes No Yes No <br /> 1. EARTH: Will the proposal result in: <br /> a. Unstable earth conditions in geologic substructures> <br /> b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering of the soil? <br /> 77 <br /> c. Change in to <br /> or ground surface relief features? X <br /> d. The destruction, covering, or modification or any unique geologic or physical <br /> features? <br /> X <br /> e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X <br /> f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, <br /> deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or <br /> the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X <br /> g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, <br /> landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? k <br /> 2. AIR: Will the proposal result in: <br /> a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air(local short-term k <br /> and/or regional long-term impacts)? <br /> b. The creation of objectionable odors? <br /> c. Violation of any ambient air quality standard, substantial contribution to an <br /> existing or projected air quality violation, or exposure of sensitive receptors <br /> to substantial pollutant concentrations? <br /> 7 <br />