COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 P age 2 . . . . . . . . . . ii 3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . • • • • • • • . . . . 1 4 INTRODUCTION . • • • • • • • • " ' 2 5 STATEMENT OF FACTS • • 5 6 ARGUMENT. . . . . . . . . . . The DISC , properly represented by the DA, on 7 I • le of the State of behalf of the People California , resolved this sand therefore the ase fully and $ over one year ago , 5 -- finally a ainst the State . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Judgment is binding g ate 10 A. The Board' s anawfulinterference tunpt to lde Judgment 1 statutorily vested in 11 with the authority Waste DTSC to enforce the Hazardous 12 Control Law. . • • • • • • • • . . . . 13 B. The DA was authorized by DTSC to bring this action nthe representedand aheaState Code , and properly public 14 in this prosecution of allegedP ; 15 offenses . - • • • • - • • " " ' C. The Judgment was within the bounds of 16 pA� s authority to act for the the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . it 18 II . This Motion mlbndernCaaiborniaecode was of 11 not timer' filed se 19 Civil Procedure Section 663a • - • • • • • • III . This Motion must be denied e iedeof .uCCPthe. . . .Board 20 cannot meet the requirements . . . . . . . 13 21 Section 663 . • • • - • • • . . . . " - . . . the Board was not a party that ?? A. Assuming the Board is not to tl�e or. i.ginal action , Motion because it 1.3 23 entitled to bring thision . . . . . . . is not an "aggrieved person . 24 The Motion to Vacate must fail because B. The inconsistent with 25 the judgment was the facts as required by CCP • . . . . . . . . 14 Section 663 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 27 CONCI,USION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 i