My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL PINAL
>
1412
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0220094
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2019 4:37:31 PM
Creation date
4/18/2019 10:56:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0220094
PE
2247
FACILITY_ID
FA0001479
FACILITY_NAME
SUMIDEN WIRE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1412
STREET_NAME
EL PINAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
117-360-40
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1412 EL PINAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�. Has the Hazardous Waste S(,__ce Reduction and Management Review Act,and associated site review and w <br /> source reduction planning process requirements, motivated your organization to implement hazardous <br /> waste reduction measures over and above what otherwise would have been implemented at the subject <br /> facility?(12) <br /> at Yes <br /> 02 No. If no, have these requirements hindered implementation of <br /> hazardous waste reduction measures at the subject facility:(13) Ot Yes Q2 No <br /> Briefly Explain: <br /> 9. To what extent has your organization implemented the hazardous waste reduction measures included in the <br /> Source Reduction Evaluation Review and Plan for the subject facility?(14) <br /> O1 Fully <br /> 552 Moderately <br /> 03 Limited <br /> 04 Not at All <br /> 10. Adjusted for any production level changes,to what extent has implementation of the hazardous waste <br /> reduction measures included in the Source Reduction Evaluation Review and Plan for the subject facility <br /> contributed to a net reduction in the generation of hazardous waste over and above what otherwise would <br /> have been achieved?(Is) <br /> Ot Significant Contribution <br /> $l2 Moderate Contribution <br /> 03 Minor Contribution <br /> 04 No Contribution at All <br /> 11. If your organization has reduced the generation of hazardous waste at the subject facility during the past <br /> two years,what have been the primary factors which have motivated your hazardous waste source <br /> reduction efforts? <br /> If,adjusted for any production level changes,generation of hazardous waste at the <br /> subject facility has not been reduced,check the following box and skip to Question 12. O(16) <br /> Very Not Not <br /> Important Important Important Applicable <br /> Air quality regulations(17) 0t :12 03 ix14 <br /> California's Hazardous Waste Source <br /> Reduction and Management Review Act(18) 0t ®2 03 Oa <br /> Cost of hazardous waste disposal(19) nt 02 03 04 <br /> Liabilities associated with hazardous waste 21 02 03 04 <br /> disposal(20) <br /> Water quality regulations(21) ❑i Q2 03 04 <br /> Worker health and safety regulations(22) 01 (�a2 03 04 <br /> Other(specify)(23) 01 02 03 &.4 <br /> Please continue to the next page. <br /> Hazardous Waste Source Reduction Questionnaire <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.