My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
2448
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231948
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2022 9:19:58 AM
Creation date
4/26/2019 4:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2001 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231948
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003855
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SHELL) 68153
STREET_NUMBER
2448
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05814001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2448 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lonitoring System Certification <br /> Site Address: 2448 W. KETTLEMAN LANE Date of Testing/Service: 09/12/2001 <br /> LOWER SACRAMENTO RD. <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed. <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ® Yes E]No Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes No Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes No Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> ® <br /> Yes El NoWere all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not' <br /> interfere with their proper operation? <br /> El Yes ❑NoN/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment(e.g. modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> Yes ®No' 7 N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected?If yes:which sensors initiate positive <br /> shut-down?(check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors, E] Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes ❑ No <br /> Yes No• ❑N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no mechanical <br /> overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s)and operating <br /> properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? Bio <br /> ® Yes• No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br /> ❑ Yes' ®No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems?(check all that apply) ❑Product, <br /> Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E, below. <br /> ® Yes F�No Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br /> ® Yes ❑No Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifications? <br /> In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.