My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - 2009
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
2448
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231948
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2022 9:31:54 AM
Creation date
4/29/2019 9:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2007 - 2009
RECORD_ID
PR0231948
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003855
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SHELL) 68153
STREET_NUMBER
2448
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05814001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2448 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN-29-2007 17:29 Service Station Systems 408 938 8888 P.03 <br /> Monitoring System Certification-P 2 of 3 <br /> Site Address: 2448 W. Kettleman Ln. @ Lower Sacramento nate of Testing/Servicing: 5129107 <br /> A. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed• 122.0 <br /> Com lete the foliowin checklist: <br /> EX Yes ❑ No' I Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> 18 Yes 0 No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> Ex Yes 0 No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> lit Yes 0 No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with thea proper operation? <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment(e.g. modem) <br /> 13 N/A operational? <br /> CK Yes Q No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> 0 N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) Ig Sump/Trench Sensors; 0 Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? M Yes 0 No <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> a N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? o % <br /> C9 Yes* 0 No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes, identify specific sensors,probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br /> 0 Yes* M No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> D Product;0 Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> I$Yes 0 Not Was monitoring system sct-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up re orfs, if a [;cable. <br /> Yes ❑ No* I is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: Replaced 205 fill sump sensor in the regular with a new 208 sensor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.