Laserfiche WebLink
Concrete, Inc. DBA Knife River Clements Plant APSA Inspection Report—COPA Findings <br /> Lodi Facility lune 6,2019 <br /> 602 CFR 1127(a)(2):Plan failed to discuss equivalent environmental protection,if applicable. <br /> The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure(SPCC)failed to discuss alternative environmental <br /> protection requirements in detail. The SPCC plan mentions the Steel Stank Institute(57I)SP-001 industry <br /> standard and provides an inspection frequency table from the STI-SP-001 standard. The SPCC plan <br /> deviates from the requirements of the STI SP-001 standard,it does not mention annual inspections or <br /> formal inspections as defined by the STI standard. The SPCC plan states that the tanks are not integrity <br /> tested and that visual inspections conducted by the facility meet the environmental equivalence of CFR <br /> section 111.8(c)(6). The SPCC plan does not discuss the reasons far non-comformance. If the SPCC Plan <br /> does not conform to the applicable requirements,you must state the reasons far non-conformance in <br /> your Plan and describe in detail alternate methods and haw you will achieve equivalent environmental <br /> protection. Immediately amend the SPCC Plan to include a discussion of equivalent environmental <br /> protection. <br /> Nate:If an owner or operator deviates from applicable industry standards to develop an integrity testing <br /> program, then a PE must certify an environmentally equivalent alternative in the SPCC Plan. The Plan <br /> must provide the reason for the deviation,describe the alternative approach, and explain haw it achieves <br /> environmental protection equivalent to the applicable industry standard. <br /> This is a Class II violation. <br /> Concrete, Inc. has adopted the industry standard inspection schedule of the STI SP-001,has eliminated <br /> the environmental equivalence wording in the SPCC Plan,and has updated the SPCC with a summary of <br /> the tanks at the facility and their inspection frequencies. <br /> 603 CFR 1127(a)(3):Failed to adequately describe the physical layout of the facility in the Plan. <br /> The facility diagram does not contain the location and contents of the 550 gallon motor ail tank, the 550 <br /> gallon hydraulic ail tank, the 110 gallon heat transfer ail container, the 40 gallon heat transfer ail <br /> container and the storage area of all drums and mobile refuekr. The Spill Prevention, Control, and <br /> Countermeasure(SPCC) Plan shall include o facility diagram which must mark the location and contents <br /> of each fixed storage container and the storage area where mobile or portable containers are located. It <br /> must identify the location of and mark as"exempt"underground tanks. It must also include all transfer <br /> stations and connecting pipes,including intra facility gathering lines. Immediately update the facility <br /> diagram to include all of the required information.Submit a legible copy of the updated facility diagram <br /> to the EHD far review. <br /> This is a repeat violation, Class H. <br /> The site map for the facility has been updated to include the information required by CFR 112.7(a)(3). <br /> KN01-SPCC_ResponwLUP-rnl.doa 2 SESPE Consulting,Inc. <br />