Laserfiche WebLink
therefore be approximately 50-100 feet north of the 100 ug/I isopleth. Alt interpretation of the <br /> plume shape is presented in Figure 2 based on these considerations. <br /> One important observation based on comparison of the plume geometry in 1992 and 1995 is that , <br /> although the area within the 50 ug/I isopleth is larger, the maximum concentrations are much less. <br /> Both the 500 and 1000 ug/1 isopleths are gone by 1995. This dissipation is attributed to pumping- <br /> aeration, and/or degradation (natural or bioremediation). <br /> 2.7 Extent of the Chloroform Plume <br /> Triple C wishes to delay any characterization work of the extent of the chloroform plume north of <br /> monitoring well MW-7. Tlie chloroform concentration detected in MW-7 is still within the range <br /> of chloroform from other potential sources in the area. <br /> 1. Swimming pool water sampled for the Final Report of the AB-1803 Follow-up Program dated <br /> December, 1987 (excerpts from that report are included in Appendix E) indicate that <br /> chloroform content in swimming pool water across the street from MW-7 was 15.9 ppb <br /> (sample No. 611 MM-PP). <br /> 2. As of 1987 there are no fewer than eight swimming pools in the Fairoaks area within 2,000 <br /> feet of MW-7. <br /> In addition, groundwater extraction efforts proposed in this work plan are designed to capture any <br /> flow away from MW-7 which may have occurred since the observed elevated samples have been <br /> reported. Design modeling of the pumping for containment of the plume described below predicts <br /> a now stagnation point will occur several hundred feet north of MW-7. <br /> 3. Groundwater pumping for containment of plume <br /> Alternatives for containment of the plume by groundwater pumping include a well or wells <br /> capable of intercepting the plume and extracting chloroform-containing groundwater. <br /> Alternatives include: <br /> • pumping from existing wells, <br /> • constructing a new well near MW-6 designed for extraction, and <br /> • constructing additional pumping wells elsewhere. <br /> "Triple E proposes to combine pumping from a new well with pumping from existing wells. Triple <br /> E will continue pumping from well MW-4A at approximately 5 gpm and will initiate pumping <br /> from a new well in the vicinity of MW-6 at a rate of approximately 20 gpm. Zile approximate <br /> capture zone from pumping in this configuration is shown on Figure 2. Tile capture zone was <br /> estimated using computer modeling described below. Sustained pumping at a rate of 25 gpm <br /> exceeds by a factor of 19 the calculated flow discharge for the aquifer draining from the plume <br /> south of MW-6 (1.3 gpm). This fact, coupled with the knowledge that the gradient is significantly <br /> flatter to the north of MW-6 suggests that sustained pumping from MW-6 at 25 gpm would <br /> contain groundwater flowing from the source area. <br /> L� 8 CONDOR <br />