Laserfiche WebLink
V 10 <br /> . !I 28 July 2003, r 5w i i <br /> AGE-NC Project`No_95-0114 <br /> 'P4ge'2 of 5 <br /> 2.2. COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:OF GROUND WATER.SAMPLES_ <br /> Ground water samples were collected from.the purged wells using.new disposable bailers.following:f <br /> recovery,of at least.80%o of the pre=purge,casmg water'volurne. immediately upon retrieval, the,; <br /> ' samples were transferred into 40-ml-EPA-approved volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials containing <br /> 0.5 aril of hydrochloric acid(18%0)as a sample preservative,and were properly labeled.The samples:' <br /> were 'transported in a..chilled• container under chain-of-custody'to. Cala Tech- Environmental. <br /> Laboratories; Inc. (CTEL); a`.State'of California Department of Health:Services;{DHS}-ceifiified <br /> laboratory in Paramount, California. The samples were analyzed.for: ; <br /> • Volatile organic.com pounds VOCs `iricludin� benzene toluene eth lbenzene and xylenes <br /> p { )� g Y. „ Y <br /> (BTE&X)and the fuel additives ethylene dibromide(EDB);.1,2-dichloroethane(1;2713CA), <br /> tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (RIPE);ethyl tert butyl ether,(ETBE), tert amyl <br /> m6thyl ether(TAME), and methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE)by EPA Method 8260B; and <br /> • . Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as stoddard solvents (TPH=ss) by EPA Method <br /> 8015 Modified. <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS ; <br /> Ground water flow direction and gradient were inferred from the field data. The current distribution <br /> of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and dissolved chlorinated'hydrocarbons was assessed from, <br /> laboratory analytical results of the soil and-ground water samples: <br /> I ' <br /> 3.1. GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND'DIRECTION <br /> During the May 2003 ground water monitoring'event, the depth to ground water at,the'site fanged <br /> from 24.37 to 25.47 feet below the tops of the well casings.The ground water elevation ranged from <br /> 15.36 to 16.24 feet below mean sea level (MSL). The ground water flow direction was toward the <br /> o ° ,northeast from well MW-5 toward well MW-10,with a gradient of approximately 0.0013 feet/feet: <br /> Ground water elevation data are summarized'in Table 1. The contoured ground Water elevation for <br /> theground water monitoring event is depicted in Figure 3, <br /> Wells MW-1 through MW-5 were screened between 30 or 34 and 50.feet bsg;wells_MW-6 through <br /> MW-10,were screened between 20,or 25 and 45 or 50 feet bsg., The ground',water level was more <br /> -than 16 feet above the tops of the screened intervals ofwells MW 71 and MW-2,almost 6 feet above <br /> ' the tops of the screened intervals ofwells MW-3R,MW-4 and MW-5,and at the tops of the screened <br /> intervals`of wells MW-6 through MW_10. n ; <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentstL Inc. ; <br />