Laserfiche WebLink
�l�tl �j <br /> IrYa{'v�y7�,''IT I yr y.,'_t'i! <br /> , r 3 t <br /> .R; } *t fl Px F f t�. .• t s 11 r AIJ-'. <br /> ; Liy <br /> y' ' .1 e R a n I t.q i w rll7 s i s•,r !I� n4y F s A! j 1j <br /> j <br /> A 'I20ll0 04May <br /> 5 AGE NC Pro}ectN '4 <br /> 6. • <br /> S Gill, i I r` <br /> Page 3 of 8' .:,,. ? , ,41t ` ` ; , <}ti i, .. <br /> - T r i <br /> s J <br /> 2:5:' 'MONITORING WELL PUICYPROCEDURES <br /> rr]](�E <br /> `.. - •. - •.,' • , y .I• �, � f '^ , Ili S . i ,J A. V ;D <br /> F , f <br /> On'28:January 2000;'dS61inst water level meter'was.used Admeasure;the,depth to groundwater in <br /> each well.relative to the tops"of the well casings: The relative''ground water elevation in eacli'well <br /> "and liydraillicFgradient were determined from these dafa(Table l). <br /> After ground water depths were measiued,,a-pre-cleaned, two-stage submersible purrip,was used to,, ' ,I <br /> evacuate water in\dells MW-:1'throu h MW-7.- the Jams sam lin•`event,'a roximatel <br /> g. . g � P g pp Y <br /> 1-2 t6, 15. gallons of water. (a minimum of three.well volumes) were removed',&orn each well: <br /> Temperature,pH and conductivity vwere mea'sured,at 3-gallon intervals using a'Hydac water analyzer. i <br /> Purged water was stored in 55= allon DOT-approved drums'on-site. Monitoringwell, stabilization,s..` <br /> data'and fiel'd-•data sheets are included in'Appendix'B. ` <br /> 2.6. COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from`each well using new disposable bailers. Ground water <br /> samples,were collected following the purging of the wells. Immediately upon retrieval; the samples <br /> were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0.5 ml:of hydrochloric acid(:18%) <br /> as a sample reservative and'were labeled. The samples were transported in a chilled container . <br /> p P � p P _ <br /> under chain-of-custody to-Kiff Analytical a State of California Department of Health Services <br /> (DHS)-certified laboratory. Samples were analyzed in.accordance.with: <br /> •: EPA Method 8015 Modified for TPH-ss <br /> ' EPA Method.8020 for BTEX and <br /> • EPA Method 8010 for HVOCs. <br /> 2.7. SURVEYING t <br /> The elevation of the top of eachwell casing installed for the Hess Dubois investigation was surveyed ; <br /> ' relative.to City of Stockton Bench Mark ##24. On 30,December 1999, a California state-licensed <br /> survey engineer from Baumbach&Piazza, Inc. surveyed a reference point on the-top of each ground% <br /> 1. <br /> •water Inonitoring well casing at the site to the-nearest�0.01-foot relative to•the City of Stockton <br /> Bench Marks and Description at 9.71 feet above mean sea level'(msl):The results of the monitoring , <br /> well survey are contained in Table'.I.,The surveying report (Baumbach,& Piazza) is presented in- <br /> Appendix C. .` <br /> _ Advanced GeoEnvironmentil,In"e. <br /> • _ _ j moi, ,n i <br />