Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) agreed. The gradient data is included in Table <br /> 3. <br /> • 3.0 PROCEDURES <br /> 3.1 Monitoring Well Purging <br /> On_December 28,_199_4,the water levels in each well were measured relative to the top of <br /> the casing using a Solinst water level meter (Table 3). No free hydrocarbon product was <br /> ' observed in any of the wells. <br /> -A bailer was used to remove standing water from each well to stabilize temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity (Appendix A). Groundwater parameters were measured at one-gallon intervals <br /> using an ICM water analyzer. The purge water was stored in 55-gallon drums on-site. <br /> ' Five gallons of water were removed from NMI Hov,,ever, MW-1 was bailed,dry after <br /> removing only three gallons of water. Less than one=half gallon of water was removed from <br /> MW before it went dry. <br /> ' 3.2 Sample Collection and Analysis <br /> ' After purging, water samples were collected using disposable plastic bailers. Samples from <br /> MW-1 and MW-2 were collected on December 28, 1994; because of poor recharge, MSV-3 <br /> was sampled on December 29, 1994. <br /> N sample was collected in three 40-m1 EPA vials. The samples were then placed in a <br /> Each p p <br /> chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody procedure to Alpha Analytical <br /> Laboratories (AAL) in Ukiah, California. Each sample was analyzed for TPH as Stoddard <br /> solvent and BTE&X in accordance with EPA methods GCFID/5030 and 602, respectively. <br /> 4.0 FINDINGS <br /> ' 4.1 Groundwater Elevation and Gradient <br /> ' The elevation of groundwater in each well was calculated by subtracting the groundwater <br /> depth from the surveyed casing elevation (Table 3). The average depth to groundwater at <br /> the site'in December 1994 was 44.80 feet.'This represents approximately a three-quarter of <br /> ' a foot increase in groundwater between October 1994 and December 1994. <br /> The groundwater gradient and flow direction in December was calculated to be 0.011_f/ft <br /> directed N 3° W (Figure 3). The gradient and flow direction is consistent with previous <br /> calculations: <br /> ' 0-e0.A.&kr-i­1- 6 <br /> • He DuBos QI24n2-26-44" <br />