My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0002702
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
300
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544424
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0002702
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 12:01:37 PM
Creation date
5/6/2019 11:45:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002702
RECORD_ID
PR0544424
PE
3529
FACILITY_ID
FA0005099
FACILITY_NAME
HESS DUBOIS CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
300
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
300 W HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Three monitoring wells and one boring were originally planned to be <br /> placed on this site. The constraints for this site, caused by the <br /> electrical transmission line running diagonally across the parcel, <br /> limited this investigation to the revised placement of three wells. <br /> WELL INSTALLATION <br /> A review of the topographic setting of the site region suggested <br /> that the regional groundwater gradient is toward the west. The <br /> location of the wells took into consideration the potential for any <br /> down-gradient migration of hydrocarbon contamination, logistical <br /> concerns, underground and overhead utilities, and the need to <br /> calculate the site specific groundwater gradient. The detailed <br /> location of the new wells is shown on Figure 2 . <br /> The monitoring wells were installed by West Hazmat Drilling Co. <br /> using an eight inch-diameter hollow stem auger. A drilling permit ' <br /> was obtained from the San Joaquin County Public Health Agency <br /> prior to the drilling. A copy of the permit is included in Appendix <br /> A. The wells extended to a depth of approximately 55 feet based on <br /> encountering groundwater at a depth of approximately 44 to 46 feet. <br /> Soil samples were collected at intervals of 5 feet were observed <br /> and logged by the Certified Engineering Geologist. <br /> The geologic units encountered in boring 1 are backfill for <br /> approximately the upper 20 feet, then underlain by fine-grained <br /> deposits consisting primarily of silty clay to clayey sand typical <br /> of flood plain deposits. Borings 2 and 3 encountered native <br /> deposits at depths of 2 to 3 feet below the ground surface. <br /> Water was first encountered at approximately 44 to 46 feet below <br /> grade. The boring and well construction log, for each well, is <br /> presented in Appendix A. <br /> Each well is constructed of 2 inch diameter PVC pipe. The bottom of <br /> each well is approximately 55 feet. A threaded end cap was placed <br /> on the bottom of the pipe. The 0. 02 inch slotted casing extends <br /> from the bottom of the well to a depth of 35 feet with solid pipe <br /> above. The sandpack is Lonestar # 3 sand and extends from the base <br /> of the well to a depth of approximately 32 feet. A transition seal <br /> of approximately 3 feet of bentonite was placed above the sand and <br /> the remainder of the annular space was sealed with grout. The top <br /> of the well is set in a traffic-rated surface vault. The casing is <br /> capped with a vapor-proof locking cap. <br /> SOIL ANALYSIS <br /> Soil samples collected at each 5 foot level, commencing at <br /> approximately 25 feet for MW-1, 20 feet for MW-2 and 11 feet for <br /> MW-3, were labeled as MW-1 sample depth, MW-2 sample depth and MW-3 <br /> sample depth. The samples were analyzed for TPH (Stoddard) and <br /> BTEX. The results are summarized below in Table 1. The certified <br /> laboratory report with detection limits is presented in Appendix B. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.