Laserfiche WebLink
.1� - V= '7 r ,I Y �; - f - •, �+j'r. 1 f1s 'i ,�. i ,. `. y, ani -' r ., <br /> 4, i I,,�yr ' l � d ' k q = r ., lY• I s,r i 4 k! <br /> n-'�' 7 A! r '' .11 !, i Sty .1 - ' •.I ii-'•o- I I��. <br /> Quarterly'Report Third Quarter 2005'' <br /> •r F' }I,I." f FAST AND EASY MART , , k <br /> 244 West Harding Way;Stockton, ni <br /> Califora' .' <br /> lA. 'INTRODUCTION <br /> ' ^At the request' f Mr:Mike Ali;Advanced GeoEnvironmental„Inc.•(AGE)has prepared the enclosed <br /> .4quarterly,report for the property located at 244 West Harding Way,Stockton-California:,The scope.` <br /> :: •, "of.work included ground water monitoring and sampling,laboratorysampie'analysis and preparation <br /> of this report: The site and surrounding area are illustrated on Figure 1. On-site structures;.soil <br /> borings, and monitoring well'locations are illustrated on Figure 2.'Site background inforination is- <br /> ,, ; included in Apoendik A. <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES 1 <br /> . ' Field procedures were performed in accordance with Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board (CVRWQCB).guidelines for the.investigation of•underground storage tank(UST) sites and <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD)guidelines for the sampling of ground <br /> ' water monitoring wells. <br /> �, . 2.1. WELL MOMTORING AND EVACUATION <br /> On 02 September 2005 Ahe depth to ground water in monitoring wells MW4 through'MW-3 was . <br />•' measured from.the to of each well casing to the nearest 0.01-foot utilizin a'Soiinst water level . <br /> , p g g - . <br /> meter, Ground water elevation in each well was calculated by subtracting the measured,depth to <br /> ground water from the 'surveyed casing elevation (Table 1). , <br /> "After water levels were measured, approximately' 8:5 gallons of water,(a minirrium of three casing ,, ' <br /> ' . water.volumesper well) were purged from each well using dedicated; disposable'plastic bailers. - <br /> Ground water temperature,pH,and conductivity were,measured at regular intervals for stabilization <br /> during purging,using an Oakton water analyzer. Field sheets and data'are included in Appendix B. <br /> ' Purged water was stored on in properly labeled,Department of.Transportation(DOT)-approved <br /> 55-gallon drums pending proper disposal. <br /> ” r 2.2. COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> �' Ground water samples'were'collected from the monitoring wells using disposable plastic'bailers; <br /> ' ;:;these bailers were-.disposed of after one use,,thereby' minimizing cross-contamination.due- to; <br /> sampling devices. Each ground water sample.was collected into-three 40-milliliter (ml) volatile <br /> ' organic analysis (VOA) vials. containing 0.5 ml ,18% hydrochloric acid..solution as•a sample ' s' <br /> preservative. After collection, the 'samples. were'labeled`and placed in-,a chilled container 'for <br /> �'' Advanced GeoEnvironm6tal Inc. <br />