Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> Aa <br /> uiN <br /> ° o 10 SAN JOAQUIN COUNT' <br /> U11It SI! eYV150Y5 <br /> donna K Reran,A E H S P <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor Carl Borgtnan, R h H S <br /> Dalerta <br /> Al Olsen,R R If S Stockton, California 95202-2708 Mike Huggins R E H S,R D I <br /> Il <br /> _r , Douglas W 'Wilson R E H S <br /> C`q Cr Fp Fa�R n�>1 rrm Mm,cigel Telephone (209) 468-3420 Margaret Lago>>o REH5 <br /> ' <br /> Lau ie A Co#Maniffla, R H 5 Fax (209) 464-0138 Robert Me ellon R L H S PI ogrrrm Rnagci <br /> RECEIVED Mark Sarcellos,R E'H S <br /> Lorre Islas / James Rinehart 8 �OQ <br /> City of Stockton <br /> 425 North El Dorado, Room 301 TRWWLLL e <br /> ' Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> ' RE FORMER CARANDO MACHINF WORKS <br /> 420 NORTH MADISON <br /> STOCK-TON, CA 95202 <br /> WORKPLAN Reinedtatson and Groundwater Work lam DATED February_14, 2003 <br /> PREPARED BY Treadwell& Rollo, Inc <br /> 01 APPROVED with Condiuons (See Below) <br /> ADEQUATE AND NECESSARY ELEMENTS OF THE WORKPLAN (H&S 25296 10, <br /> Msubd (c)(3) ) <br /> Remove contaminated soil in an excavation 10 feet.vide by 25 feet long by 25 feet deep with an <br /> 1 estimated volume of 230 cubic yards One excavanon volume of groundwater approximately 12,000 <br /> gallons will also be pumped and removed The area of excavation is located to the north of the <br /> former underground storage tanks and the previous excavation of contaminated soil which took <br /> place at the above-referenced site in June 2004 <br /> COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS <br /> ' 1 Your consultant has proposed this additional excavation of contaminated soil since future <br /> development at the site may permanently restrict access for additional investigation and <br /> remediation of the contamination San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> (EHD) approves this proposal with the condition that it is understood that the cost may not <br /> ' be reimbursed by the State Underground Storage Tank Clean Up Fund (Fund) <br /> 2 The work plan recommended the placement of 800 pounds of oxygen release compound <br /> (ORC) at the bottom of the proposed excavation as an additional remediation measure for the <br /> ' contaminated soil and groundwater EHD does not approve the use of ORC since its <br /> effectiveness has not been shown at other sites in San Joaquin County However,you ma} <br /> place ORC in the excavation with the understanding that the cost may not be reimbursed b3 <br /> the Fund <br /> REASONS FOR DISAPPROVAL OF THE WORKP (H&S 2529610,subd (C)(3) ) <br /> None ( � <br /> DATED. March 3,2005 _ BY /fI <br /> C Treadwell&Rollo-- David Dixon,RCS/ <br /> ' C RWQCB, Central Valley Region—James L L Barton,RG <br />