Laserfiche WebLink
STI.Sea <br /> ttla <br /> 5755 eStreet East <br /> STL <br /> Tacoma,WA 98424 <br /> • Tel 2639222310 <br /> Fax 253 922 5047 <br /> 'DATA QUALIFIERS AND ABBREVIATIONS w+rvwjL-inc com <br /> 131 This analyte was detected in the associated method blank The analyte concentration was determined not , <br /> to be significantly higher than the associated method blank (less than ten times the concentration reported <br /> in the blank) <br /> B2 This analyte was detected in the associated method blank The analyte concentration in the sample was <br /> determined to be significantly higher than the method blank (greater than ten times the concentration <br /> reported in the blank) <br /> C1 Second column confirmation was performed The relative percent difference value (RPD) between the <br /> results on the two columns was evaluated and determined to be < 40% <br /> C2 Second column confirmation was performed The RPD between the results on the two columns was <br /> evaluated and determined to be > 40% The higher result was reported unless anomalies were noted <br /> C3 Second analysis confirmation was performed The relative percent difference value (RPD) between the , <br /> results on the two columns was evaluated and determined to be < 30% <br /> C4 Second analysis confirmation was performed The RPD between the results on the two columns was <br /> evaluated and determined to be > 30% The original analysis was reported unless anomalies were noted <br /> M GC/MS confirmation was performed The result derived from the original analysis was reported <br /> D The reported result for this analyte was calculated based on a secondary dilution factor <br /> E The concentration of this analyte exceeded the instrument calibration range and should be considered an <br /> estimated quantity <br /> J The analyte was analyzed for and positively identified, but the associated numerical value is an estimate(" <br /> quantity <br /> MCL Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> MDL Method Detection Limit <br /> RL Reporting Limit <br /> N See analytical narrative <br /> ND Not Detected <br /> X1 Contaminant does not appear to be "typical" product Elution pattern suggests it maybe <br /> X2 Contaminant does not appear to be 'typical" product , <br /> X3 Identification and quantitation of the analyte or surrogate was complicated by matrix interference <br /> X4 RPD for duplicates was outside advisory QC limits The sample was re-analyzed with similar results The <br /> sample matrix may be nonhomogeneous ' <br /> X4a RPD for duplicates outside advisory QC limits due to analyte concentration near the method practical <br /> quantitation Irmrt/detection limit <br /> X5 Matrix spike recovery was not determined due to the required dilution I <br /> Xfi Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike(/matnx spike duplicate)outside advisory QC limits Sample <br /> was re-analyzed with similar results <br /> X7 Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike(/matnx spike duplicate) outside advisory QC limits Matrix ' <br /> interference may be indicated based on acceptable blank spike recovery and/or RPD <br /> X7a Recovery andfor RPD values for this spiked analyte outside advisory QC limits due to high concentration <br /> of the analyte in the original sample <br /> X8 Surrogate recovery was not determined due to the required dilution <br /> X9 Surrogate recovery outside advisory QC limits due to matrix interference <br /> m <br /> (SAM RIcV 16 112003 <br />