Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF STOCKTON REDE--7LOPMENT AGENCY Pagel of 2 <br /> Fl <br /> LTCP CIIeCIS115t � GD GEOTRACKER HOME I MANAGE PROJECTS I REPORTa I SEARCH I LOW <br /> CITY OF STOC KTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY(TO607730522)-MAP THIS SITE OPEN-ELIGIBLE FOR CLOSURE <br /> 423 MADISON CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES <br /> STOCKTON,CA 95202 ACTIVITIES REPORT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOP(LEAD)-CASE O:0001564 <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY $LIC WEBPAGE CASEWORKER:l(SAMEDINA.SUPERVfSOR:ADRIENNE ELLSAESSER <br /> PU CENTRAL VALLEY RLNQCB(REGION 55)-CASE#:391162 <br /> V1rW PRINTABLE_CASE SUMMARY FOR THs SITE CASEWORKER:JAMES BAR TCJN.SUPERVISOR:BRIAN NEWMAN <br /> THIS PROJECT WAS LAST MODIFIE=D BY N11FI UEh2caS0ON 6/262013 11:11:37 AM-fiISTORY <br /> THIS SITE HAS SUBMITTALS.COCK t[09 TO OPEN A NEW WINDOW WITH THE SuBM1TTAL APPROVAL PAGE FOR THIS SITE. <br /> CLOSURE POLICY THIS VERSION IS IN PROGRESS AS OF 6/26/2013 CHECKLIST INITIATED ON=tWO13 CLOSURE POLICY HISTORY <br /> Genera(Criteria-The site satisfies the policy general criteria-CLEAR SECTION ANrMRs NO <br /> a.Is the unauthorized release Fouled within the service area of a public waters stem? <br /> Name of water System: JCityOfSIDcktOn ( (' YES 0 NO <br /> b.The unauthorized release consists only Of petroleum ' fo. Co_ YES 0 NO <br /> c.The unauthorized('primary')release from the UST system has been stopped, r YES G NO <br /> d.Free product has been removed to the maximum extent practicable LGL4) rFP Not Encountered G YES G NO <br /> e.A conceptual site model that assesses the nature extent,and mobility of the release has been developed jjnfo. <br /> Description(Check all that Apply): <br /> F__GW Not Evaluated <br /> Groundwater Assessment Incomplete-Areal Extent of Contamination Not Defined <br /> F_Groundwater Assessment Incomplete-Depth of Contamination Not Defined _ <br /> r Hydrogeology Not Adequately Defined YES r' NO <br /> F Potential Receptors Not Identified <br /> F Soil Assessment Incomplete-Areal Extent Not Defined <br /> I <br /> F Soil Assessment Incomplete.Depth Unknown <br /> F Soil Vapor Not Evaluated <br /> Other <br /> f.Secondary source has been removed to the extent practicable '(Info}. YES 0 NO <br /> g.Soil or groundwater has been tested for MTBE and results reported in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section <br /> 25296.15. G Not Required r' YES G NO <br /> It.Does a nuisance exist,as defined by Water Code section 13050. G YES r' NO <br /> 1,Meda-Specific Criteria:Groundwater-The contaminant plume that exceeds water quality objectives is stable or decreasing in areal extent,andNO <br /> meets all of the additional characteristics of one of the five Gasses of sites fisted below.-CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS <br /> EXEMPTION-Soil Only Case(Release has=Affected Groundwater-Info) Q YES r- NO , <br /> Does the site meet any of the Groundwater specific criteria scenarios? G YES r' NO <br /> ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS-Please rndicato only those conditions that do not meet the policy criteria: <br /> Plume Length(That Exceeds Water Quality Objectives): i <br /> G t 1 OC Feet and<250 Feet ('I t 250 Feet and<1,000 Feet r,t 1,000 Feet r'Unknown <br /> Plume is Stable or Decreasing in AREAL Extent <br /> O No G Unknown <br /> Free Product in Groundwater; <br /> Yes r No C}Unknown <br /> Free Product Has Been Removed to the Maximum Extent Practicable: <br /> No L'�Unknown I <br /> For sites with free product,the Plume Has Seen Stable or Decreasing for 5-Years(Info): <br /> G No G Unknown _ <br /> For sites with tree product,owner Willing to Accept a Land Use Restriction(if required) <br /> G No ri Unknown <br /> Free Product Extends Offsite <br /> G Yes q Unknown <br /> Benzene Concentration: <br /> ,t 1,000 pgII and 3,000 pgll 0 t 3,400 pgfl p Unknown' <br /> MTBE Concentration <br /> G t 1,000 p911 r Unknown <br /> Nearest Supply Well(From Plume Boundary): <br /> t'�5 250 Feet 0>250 Feet and 5 1,000 Feet r Unknown <br /> Nearest Surface Water Body(From Plume Boundary) <br /> C}5 250 Feet (_''>250 Feet and 5 1,000 Feet G Unknown - <br /> 2.Media Specific Criteria:Petroleum Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air-The site is considered low-threat for the vapor-intrusion-to-air pathway if site- NO <br /> specific conditions satisfy items 2a,20,or 2c-CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS ; <br /> EXEMPTION-Active Commercial Petroleum Fueling Facility r YES (:, NO <br /> https://geotracker.waterboard s.ca.gov/regulators/screens/c to sure_policy.asp?gl obal_id=TO... 6/26/2013 <br />