Laserfiche WebLink
' 4 r <br /> TABLE 9 <br /> SOIL AND GROUND WATER CORRECTIVE ACTION ALTERNAI IVES <br /> Former Chase Chevrolet (Van Buren) Facility <br /> 424 North Van Buten Street, Stockton, California <br /> t Estimated Costs Typical <br /> (incl " Estimated <br /> Method Advantages Disadvantages Monitoring <br /> n Monitoring and Duration <br /> Maintenance) Requirements - <br /> Natural Attenuation • Lower costs than most active • Not effective for hwher $7,500 to$I0,000 Quarterly ground Unknown <br /> (Ground water) remedial alternatives• Minimal contaminant concentrations• annually plus water monitoring <br /> j disturbance to the site• Potential Migration of contamination installation of any <br /> use below structures may occur• Longer time frame required wells <br /> than active remediation • May ' <br /> not achieve cleanup levels <br /> within reasonable length of <br /> time •Not generally permitted <br /> when free product is present <br /> 5 <br /> a <br /> Advanced CeoLnvjronnlcnlal,tic <br />