Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 04 March 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> Page 14 of 18 <br /> ' installation of additional injection points, screened at a depth of approximately 35 feet bsg IAS must <br /> be combined with vapor extraction to contain vapors stripped from'the ground water The installation <br /> of extraction wells would also be required , <br /> E <br /> 7 1 3 MONITORING ACTIVITIES v <br /> One potential problem associated wi6air sparging is inad%extent lateral spreading of the' hydrocarbon plume This is due either to mounding of ground water above injection points or lateral air flow away <br /> froin sparging wells To detect thus problem, ground water,depths in monitoring wells and extraction <br /> wells (if appropriate) should be monitored on a monthly basis (nuninium) to detect mounding and the <br /> ' (presence of organic vapors <br /> ' 714 FEASIBILITY _ <br /> 3^ <br /> Air injection and extraction rates must be balanced to prey ent the forced migration of contaminants <br /> An intensive piping network for injection and extraction must be installed for this method to be <br /> etlective As in vapor extraction, air sparging is not effective in the remediation of Ionger-chain <br /> hydrocarbons, which are practically not strippable from v ater Data from the aur sparging pilot test <br /> r indicated the movement of hydrocarbons to extraction points A lower injection pressui e, <br /> approximately 10 psi, and surging of injected air should be used at the site to minimize aur channeling <br /> and promote maximum interaction of injected air with ground water A closer injection well spacing <br /> would be required with a lower injection rate Very low concentrations of dissolved iron were <br /> detected in water samples at the site Therefore, clogging of sparging points and foriniation pore space <br /> ' shoufd not occur due to iron precipitation h <br /> ' 715 DURATION <br /> Air sparging in highly permeable aquifers generally, results in rapid reduction of hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in the satur=ated zone Remediation times are generally comparable with soil vapor <br /> extraction times At the subject site, we estimate a remediation pei i-od of 12 to 24 months for shorter- <br /> chain hydrocarbons 'Longer-chain(diesel) hydrocarbons were detected water samples collected fi om <br /> 1 monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-12 during the October 1995 sampling However, the presence of. <br /> diesel was not confit coed during the February 1996 monitoring event <br />