My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VICTOR
>
880
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0503634
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 4:40:56 PM
Creation date
5/7/2019 4:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0503634
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0005914
FACILITY_NAME
VICTOR ROAD SHELL
STREET_NUMBER
880
STREET_NAME
VICTOR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04905032
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
880 VICTOR RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C A M B R I A <br /> are in active remediation and using an insitu technology that may alter(break down) the methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) molecule into other compounds. An example of this type of <br /> technology is ozone sparging. This type of treatment technology oxidizes MTBE and may result <br /> in breakdown products of known compounds or perhaps some unknown compounds. These <br /> unknown compounds are of concern for the CVRWQCB, which is the reason they request the <br /> 'report all peaks'analysis in this situation." <br /> Based on the information outlined above that was provided to Cambria by the CVRWQCB, an <br /> EPA Method 8260 peaks report is not warranted at this site. Cambria requested that SJCEHD <br /> © withdraw this request in the letter referenced above. To date, we have not received a response <br /> from SJCEHD. <br /> MTBE Hydrolysis <br /> In the March 21, 2003 letter, SJCEHD expresses concern about the "...potential hydrolysis of <br /> MTBE to TBA [tertiary butanol] and methanol in groundwater samples" and requests that Shell <br /> "...collect split samples for at least two quarters, with one group using an acidic preservative, <br /> and the other using a base, trisodium phosphate(TSP)." An EPA Fact Sheet entitled Analytical <br /> Methodologies for Fuel Oxygenates (EPA 510-F-03-001) dated April 2003 (included as <br /> Appendix A) advocates using TSP as a sample preservative when samples arc heated to an <br /> elevated temperature (80°C) during preparation or analysis. Research cited in Oxygenate <br /> Measurements in Groundwater. Do We Need to Worry About MTBE Acid Hydrolysis? (Bauman, <br /> 2003) also suggests that the combination of a low-pH sample preservative and elevated heat <br /> during sample preparation or analysis can lead to MTBE hydrolysis to TBA. However, this <br /> article also demonstrates that the amount of TBA produced by hydrolysis is insignificant in acid- <br /> preserved samples if the samples are only heated to 45°C or less. This article is provided as <br /> Appendix B, and two additional articles that are discussed in the Bauman article (including a <br /> case study)are included for your reference as Appendix C. <br /> Shell's laboratory only heats the groundwater samples to 45°C for oxygenate analyses. <br /> Therefore, because the sample temperature is kept appropriately low, it is not necessary to use <br /> TSP as a sample preservative to prevent MTBE hydrolysis to TBA, and Shell respectfully <br /> declines to collect split samples and conduct a study of sample preservatives at this site. <br /> 0955 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.