COMPLIANCE INFO 1997 - 2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page-of 8. 1 jLLL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TE5 MNG Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer El Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑Other(Specify) Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑ Vacuum M Hydrostatic ❑Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Wayne Perry Inc. See Attached Results Equipment Resolution: .0007" SUMP! Sump# Sump# 171Sump# Sump Diameter: Al<" y¢ " 91 " Sump Depth: 6 " 6 9 " G 9 „ Sump Material: —" Height from Tank Top to Top of „ Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 3/ ?v Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested' 2"ABOVE HIGHEST 2"ABOVE HIGHEST 2"ABOVE HIGHEST 2"ABOVE HIGHEST PENETRATION PENETRATION PENETRATION PENETRATION Wait time between applying water 15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes and starting test: Test Start Time: =3/ :8/ '-To Initial Reading(Rj): G o s a S Z Z.32 .3 7 Test End Time: 9=yt 9 G —/O.—Os Final Reading(RF): /, oG/ (.Z85-19 -2, ;y 7-// Test Duration: 15 Min 15 Min 15 Min 15 Min 15 Min 15 Min 15 Min 15 Min Change in Reading(RF-RO: ,00// eC .3 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: -0.0020 -0.0020 -0.0020 -0.0020 -0.0020 -0.0020 -0.0020 1 -0.0020 Test Rexult &_:. . Is there a sensor in the sump? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA 1KI Yes ❑No ❑NA QI Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Does sensor alarm when either ®Yes ❑No ❑NA El Yes ❑No ❑NA 0 Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA product or water is detected? Was sensor removed for Testing? KI Yes ❑No ❑NA ®Yes ❑No ❑NA ®Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and ®Yes ❑No ❑NA 19 Yes ❑No ❑NA ®Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA verified functional after testing? Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) Arco 6313 1100 S. Main St. Manteca, Ca 95337 N05789 SB 989 Testing