My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997 - 2005
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1100
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506504
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997 - 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 4:09:41 PM
Creation date
5/10/2019 2:31:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997 - 2005
RECORD_ID
PR0506504
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007464
FACILITY_NAME
MAIN STREET ARCO AM PM*
STREET_NUMBER
1100
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
22119062
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1100 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MoMtoring System Certilkuti ox <br /> Site Addres :_;6313: i m S MAIN STREET,MANTECA,CA 95337 Date ofTe.sunoervicing: s-- <br /> - s <br /> _.. _ . <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing ; <br /> Software Version Installed: f <br /> .i <br /> Com lete the following checklist: <br /> s - No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> *Yes No* Is the visual alarm o erationat? <br /> Yes No* Were all sensors visuallyins ected,function tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> , Yes No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ( f Yes N * If alarms are relayed to a remote' monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> fA operational? <br /> es No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> (] NIA monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate, s electrically disconnect� If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut dawn? (Check al:thatgaply) r�S�piTrenchSensors, al spenserC entSensors. <br /> Did you confirm�positive shutdown due to leaks�sent of failure/disconnection? .-f-es; JJNo. <br /> Yes * For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ' A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill o' s and operating pro erl ..If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarmtrigger? . . . .% <br /> I Yes* o Was any monitoring equipm6at replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all re lacement arts in Section E,below. <br /> Jesess <br /> * No Was liquid found inside arty secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all t3aa�y)L~] <br /> Product; M Water. If es describe causes in Section E,below <br /> ta No* Was monit s stem seta reviewed tc ensure ro er settin s? <br /> 5No* Is all monitog'U e ui mento erelional seer manufacturer's s ecifications? <br /> *Ix Sectiox E below,descrO)e how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 0161 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.