My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2010 - 2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1100
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506504
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2010 - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2023 11:22:26 AM
Creation date
5/13/2019 8:45:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2010 - 2018
RECORD_ID
PR0506504
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007464
FACILITY_NAME
MAIN STREET ARCO AM PM*
STREET_NUMBER
1100
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
22119062
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1100 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, California 95205-6232 <br /> Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)468-3433 Web:www.sigov.orq/ehd <br /> Underground Storage Tank Program Inspection Report <br /> Facility Name: Facility Address: Date: <br /> MAIN STREET ARCO AM PM' 1 1100 S MAIN ST, MANTECA March 28, 2017 <br /> SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS <br /> (CLASS I,CLASS II,or MINOR-Notice to Comply) <br /> Item# Remarks <br /> 209 CCR 2715(c) Designated operator did not inspect all required items and/or the inspection reports not completed. <br /> The designated operator failed to check and note the correct test dates for the"Secondary Containment Testing," <br /> from March 2016 through March 2017 designated operator monthly inspection reports. The"Secondary Containment <br /> Test Date,"was incorrectly noted as being performed on 9/7/14.The secondary containment test was performed on <br /> 9/17/14. During the monthly inspection, the designated operator shall check that all required testing and <br /> maintenance for the UST system have been completed and document the dates they were done. Ensure that <br /> designated operators performing monthly inspections at this facility are including all of the required information on the <br /> reports. <br /> This was corrected onsite. <br /> This is a Class II violation. <br /> 309 CCR 2636(f)(1) Monitoring in sump/UDC failed to activate an audible and visual alarm or stop the flow product. <br /> The model 323 sensors in the 89 and 91 submersible turbine pump sumps failed to activate an audible and visual <br /> alarm when tested to ensure continuous monitoring of the tank system. <br /> The technician retested the sensor, and it passed. <br /> This was corrected onsite. <br /> This is a minor violation. <br /> 315 HSC 25291(e)Water in secondary containment not removed,analyzed, and properly disposed of(pre-Jul 2003). <br /> Approximately 2 cups liquid was observed in the 89 submersible turbine pump sump and 1/2 cup of liquid was <br /> observed in the 91 spill container. If water could enter into the secondary containment by precipitation or infiltration, <br /> it must be removed and disposed of properly. Ensure that all sumps and annular spaces are maintained free of <br /> liquid. <br /> This was corrected onsite. <br /> This is a Class II violation. <br /> 318 CCR 2636(0(2) Leak detector failed to detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi. <br /> The 89-FE Petro line leak detector failed to detect a leak when tested. All line leak detectors shall be capable of <br /> detecting a 3-gallon per hour leak at 10 psi. Immediately have a properly licensed, trained, and certified contractor <br /> repair or replace the failed leak detector(LG 113-x listed, if applicable)and obtain a permit within one business day <br /> from the EHD. If the failed leak detector can't be replaced immediately,there is a possibility that the 89 grade UST <br /> system may be red tagged to prevent fuel inputs. <br /> This is a minor violation. <br /> Overall Inspection Comments: <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.