Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County <br /> .� Environmental Health Department DIRECTOR <br /> .o <br /> 2. Linda Turkatte,REHS <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205-6232 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> Robert McClellon, REHS <br /> Jeff Carruesco,REHS, RDI <br /> Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> iFi60 \ Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Rodney Estrada, REHS <br /> Phone: (209)468-3420 Adrienne Ellsaesser, REHS <br /> Fax: (209)464-0138 <br /> March 12, 2014 <br /> Ernesto Renteria, Jr. <br /> 3312 West Creek Drive Uti <br /> Stockton, CA 95209 S1_/' <br /> �u <br /> Subject: Pimental Property <br /> 1650 S. EI Dorado Street <br /> Stockton, CA 95219 <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed Additional Site <br /> Assessment Report (ASAR), dated 16 October 2014, and Phase 11 Site Assessment Report (Phase <br /> ll), dated 25 November 2013, both prepared by your consultant Advanced GeoEnviron mental, Inc. <br /> (AGE). The EHD also referred to Phase 11 Site Assessment Work Plan (Work Plan) dated 21 <br /> October 2013 and Phase 11 Site Assessment Work Plan Addendum (Addendum) dated 25 <br /> September 2014 for additional information. <br /> According to the information presented in Phase ll, the site was the location of a dry cleaning facility <br /> from circa 1911 to 1960, and potentially utilized an underground storage tank (UST) for petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon fuel. The structures and surface materials from the time of this property usage no <br /> longer exist, so there is some uncertainty as to the exact locations of critical dry-cleaning equipment <br /> when employed on the site. <br /> The scope of work performed for Phase 11 included advancement of two soil borings (131 and 132) in <br /> the location of the former dry cleaning facility and one soil boring (133) in the inferred former location <br /> of the UST to collect soil and grab groundwater samples for laboratory analysis for potential <br /> chemicals of concern (COCs) such as total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPHg) <br /> and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). <br /> Neither soil nor groundwater samples collected from borings B1 and B2 were impacted by CDCs, <br /> but the two soil samples from 15 feet and 20 feet below surface grade (bsg) analyzed from boring <br /> B3 were impacted by TPHg and various VOCs, but not by benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene or <br /> xylenes (BTEX); the groundwater sample from B3 was impacted by TPHg and the various VOCs, <br /> including toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes. Naphthalene was detected in the B3 soil and <br /> groundwater samples. AGE noted intense hydrocarbon odor and discoloration in soil samples <br /> collected from 10 feet to 30 feet bsg in B3. Based on the findings presented in Phase ll, AGE <br /> recommended additional investigation. <br /> For the additional assessment, as reported in ASAR, AGE advanced three borings (134 through 136) <br /> to 3 feet bsg to collect soil gas samples and one boring (137) to 40 feet bsg on the west side of the <br /> property to collect soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis for the COCs. One soil gas <br /> sample (134) was collected in the approximate footprint of the dry cleaning-facility building, one (135) <br />