Laserfiche WebLink
Woolsey Oil -3- , yi Y Ma 5, 2009 <br /> j Claim No. 14328 <br /> i . <br /> C. Groundwater Trends: ' <br /> • MTBE trends are shown below: <br /> t ,. •.:. . �„ '. fiE 'l;rY +vr fw ..—. .''py,` k.. •� Jk <br /> METHYL-=TERT-B.UTYL'�ETHER`�(MTB ) ResUlts for MW3 <br /> f 180,0 <br /> 1600 4 $ <br /> .. 1400 T . � '`k. � 4 '��.".�M,n .YfrY• — . <br /> t E{Y# e <br /> 10 <br /> 12{10 <br /> 10(30 - . .- .* •� ` <br /> 80 <br /> 0AF X <br /> t 14 E <br /> 16 <br /> 600- <br /> 400 <br /> 00 400 18 <br /> 200 <br /> 22 <br /> .._ METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER(MTBE) Depth to Water' <br /> i <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: no wells identified within Y2 mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: active retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the.extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> . .3-. �,.�y.. •' <br /> C: Groundwater Monitoring Summary. strong mo'nitormg history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: none identified . <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> F. Recommendation: :r <br /> In May 2008, the Fund made the following recommendation: The San Joaquin <br /> County LOP has directed the Responsible Party to assess remedial technologies <br /> including an insitu-chemical oxidation pilot test. The Fund concurs with the need <br /> to assess remedial technologies at this site. The Fund will review this site next <br /> year to track progress. <br /> UPDATED, May 2009: Based on the following criteria, the Fund recommends <br /> this site be considered for closure providing a health hazard risk assessment is <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> - � I <br /> Za Re,.vd d Paper <br /> >I,� I <br />