Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> i <br /> '7 1 <br /> Criterion 9.s The throe alternatives are all comparable in terms <br /> JI <br /> of impacts upon water conservation. i <br /> f' (OON The analysis of soil and groundwater remediation' aiternatives for <br /> this site indicate a properly designed and maintained cap in <br /> conjunction with poet closure monitoring is the most effective <br /> approach. The cap should provide a low permeability barrier <br /> eivalent to Cover specified in Article 8, Section 2$81 of Chapter <br /> qu <br /> i <br /> This cep might 1�,, dp C.CR. include a flexible asphalt system with <br /> 15 <br /> i' underiiner such as the M1RArl MCF-1212 (Att chment 2). The <br /> installed system must be -impable of preventing l infiltration and <br />�! directing surface drainage. A yearly inspection, report including <br /> recommended maintenance and repair measures would be a part fl! the <br />'�s t monitoring program. <br /> I <br /> r <br /> a j <br /> f r , <br /> I <br /> k <br /> I f <br /> II <br /> z <br />