Laserfiche WebLink
-POW.-N IN <br /> �� �s',S'ti.. W-MAN, <br /> Gam' <br /> e' <br /> Criterion 9.n The three alternatives are all comparable in terms <br /> of impacts upon, water cor=servation. <br /> The analysis of soil and g-oundwater remediation a-'ternatives for <br /> this site indicate a properly designed znd maintained can in <br /> conjunction with post closure monitoring is the most effective <br /> approach. The cap should provide a low permeability barrier <br /> equivalent to cover specified in Article 8, Section 2581 of Chapter <br /> 15, 40 CCR. This cap might include a flexible asphalt sys er► with <br /> an underliner such as the MIRAFI MCF-1212 (Attachment 2). The <br /> installed system must be capable of preventing infiltration and <br /> directing surface drainage. A yearly inspection report including <br /> recommended ^1aintenance and repair measures wou:',d be a part of the <br /> monitoring program. <br /> f - <br /> MEL!!402.op <br />