Laserfiche WebLink
Re-Manufacturing Closure Plan -2- 19 September 1991 <br /> permeability analysis after the first two lifts (one foot) , and again after the final <br /> two lifts. What is the methodology for repairing holes made for testing purposes in <br /> final cap? (bentonite pellets?) <br /> We need an actual field measurement of permeability according to Section 2541(c) of <br /> Chapter 15, which states in part, "Permeabi 1 i ties shall be determined primarily by <br /> appropriate field test methods in accordance with accepted civil engineering <br /> practice. . . . Appropriate compaction tests may be used in conjunction with laboratory <br /> permeability tests to determine field permeabilities as long as a reasonable number of <br /> field permeability tests are also conducted." Acceptable field test methods include <br /> the use of an air permeameter or double ring infiltrometer. <br /> A test pad should be constructed to verify the adequacy of the materials, design, <br /> equipment and construction procedures, proposed for the soil cap. The test pad should <br /> accurately represent the performance of the proposed full-scale cap. The test pad <br /> compaction and testing must be well documented, and the materials (soils) , procedures, <br /> and equipment used in the test pad must be the same as those used during construction <br /> of the full scale cap. If field permeability tests take a long time, they should be <br /> conducted on a test pad. This is only useful if the test pad and full scale cap are <br /> constructed the same way, using the same materials, equipment, etc. . Re-Manufacturing <br /> must describe how the test pad will be constructed and what the dimensions will be. <br /> The plan states that there will be a natural or synthetic drainage layer above the <br /> final cap and below the vegetative layer. What specific type of drainage layer will <br /> be used? <br /> Comment No. 5 <br /> A site plan, cross-section and general finish grade maps were included in the report. <br /> We still need an east-west cross-section, like figure 2, showing the profile of the <br /> waste and cap. Is the cap keyed-in to the east and west, as it is along the slough? <br /> Does the capped waste change the configuration of the slough? We need a plan view <br /> showing the final configuration of the channel . <br /> Comment No. 6 <br /> Based on storm water elevations for the Slough, is five to six feet of rip-rap enough? <br /> A curb and gutter will be placed along the southern boundary of the cap to divert site <br /> runoff around the cap. It will be tied into the 18-inch storm drain which runs through <br /> the property. Where, exactly, is the discharge point of the 18-inch storm drain? <br /> Comment No. 7 <br /> The plan states that the surface of the cap will be inspected on a monthly basis and <br /> following heavy precipitation events for a period of one year. After one year it will <br /> be monitored on a periodic basis. In addition, post-closure maintenance should <br /> continue on a monthly basis until the vegetation is very well established (if that does <br /> not occur within the first year) . What type of vegetation will be used and what is the <br /> rooting depth? <br />