Laserfiche WebLink
' GEOMATFIIX <br /> Consultants (Weston), also on behalf of PureGro, removed two 1,000-gallon underground gasoline <br /> storage tanks located along the southeastern side of the warehouse. Four soil samples collected from <br /> the bottom of the excavation showed elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents. In <br /> March 1993, Geological Audit Services (GAS) installed four groundwater monitoring wells, designated <br /> MW-I through MW-4, and one additional soil boring in the vicinity of the excavation (Figure 2). GAS <br /> continued to monitor wells MW-1 through MW-5 in January 1994, November 1995, and May 1996. <br /> ' PureGro installed a sixth shallow groundwater monitoring well, designated MW-6, along the western <br /> property boundary in the vicinity of the evaporation ditch; however, the date when this well was <br /> installed is unknown. Due to the detection of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs), specifically 1,2- <br /> ' dichloropropane(1,2-DCP), in groundwater in the vicinity of the gasoline storage tanks, all past tenants <br /> were requested by the RWQCB to investigate the use of this compound. It was found that 1,2-DCP had <br /> ' been stored on site and all tenants were directed to conduct a historical site use survey and to develop an <br /> investigation program. <br /> ' In March 1995, TreaTek-CRAT" conducted an investigation at the Facility on behalf of OCC. Results <br /> of the investigation, which will hereafter be referred to as the Initial Site Investigation (Initial SI), were <br /> ' presented in the Site Investigation Report and submitted to the RWQCB in May 1995 (TreaTek, 1995). <br /> A Secondary Site Investigation (Secondary SI) was conducted between September 1995 and January <br /> ' 1996, the results of which were submitted to the RWQCB in May 1996 (TreaTek, 1996b). As part of <br /> these investigations, nine additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW-7 through MW-15) were <br /> installed at and immediately downgradient of the Facility (Figure 2). In addition, a Supplemental Site <br /> ' Investigation (Supplemental SI) was conducted in June 1996 to characterize surface soil at the Facility <br /> (TreaTek, 1996d). These data were used to conduct a Human Health Risk Assessment. <br /> ' During May and June 1997, Geomatrix conducted an additional subsurface characterization to further <br /> ' evaluate subsurface conditions beneath and in the vicinity of the Facility (Geomatrix, 1997b). This <br /> investigation included the drilling and sampling of six exploration borings to a depth of about 150 feet <br /> below ground surface (bgs) and the installation of four monitoring wells, MW-16 through MW-19 <br /> ' (Figure 2). In addition, monitoring well MW-5a was installed as a replacement for damaged well <br /> MW-5. Two monitoring wells (MW-16 and MW-17) were installed in an upgradient position to <br /> ' evaluate background groundwater conditions. <br /> Groundwater has been monitored on a quarterly or trimesterly (three times per year) basis since March <br /> ' 1995; the monitoring program currently entails collecting samples from monitoring wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-19. The results of these monitoring events were submitted to the RWQCB either as part <br /> ' of the aforementioned investigation programs or as quarterly/trimesterly monitoring reports. Geomatrix <br /> Consultants has been conducting groundwater monitoring activities for the Facility since June 1996 on <br /> ' behalf of GSHI. <br /> ' cwaorernc�umoocuNr�xsra>aoc 3 <br />