Laserfiche WebLink
I1`S <br /> Bi* oremediation.11 <br /> AW. Yths Vs ,., Realities <br /> Although biological methods have been used to treat hazardous waste for more than a decade, <br /> there are still those who question the technology's potential and those who overrate its use. <br /> By Geoffrey H. Swett <br /> hen biore- Field. Although many biore- <br /> mediation mediation projects com- <br /> was first pleted to date have been <br /> widely - either laboratory- or dem- <br /> commercialized in the mid- onstration-scale work, this <br /> 1980s, few in the hazard- is simply a function of the <br /> ous waste cleanup busi- lengthy regulatory process <br /> ness could predict its rapid F associated with remedia- <br /> acceptance by industry tion projects in general <br /> and regulators. In the six and NOT a function of <br /> years since the First Super- flawed or emerging technol- <br /> fund Record of Decision ogy. <br /> (ROD) to use bioremedia- The fact is, there are <br /> tion was issued, some 36 many examples of full-scale <br /> RODS incorporating biore- field applications of biore- <br /> mediation have been mediation, with the pros- <br /> handed out.' pect of more to follow. EPA, <br /> In addition, the Envi- for example, has identified <br /> ronmental Protection In the bioremediation process, microorganisms can be used to degrade approximately 132 projects <br /> Agency (EPA) has identi- hazardous contaminants. The contaminated wastewater samples here have been that had gone into the field <br /> j <br /> fled at least 124 projects in scanned with an electron microscope to enhance study of the samples'biology. by 1991;to date,90 of these <br /> p Photos courtesy Electro Scan, Trisha Rice,photographer. <br /> which bioremediation is have been completed.3 One <br /> being considered as a treatment doubts about its potential for full-scale firm has completed more than 30 <br /> method.2 EPA's numbers might be low; cleanup projects.Others do not believe full-scale remediation projects involy- <br /> it is estimated that more than 250 bioremediation can be cost effective. ing the bioremediation of 360,000 cubic <br /> future bioremediation projects are Still others think bioremediation is so yards of contaminated soil and sludges. <br /> undergoing serious evaluation. simple, any environmental engineer- Equally impressive is the fact that <br /> What all this indicates is that the ing and contracting firm can apply the two Superfund projects using bioreme- <br /> use of bioremediation for full-scale technology to a given project. diation have achieved the treatment <br /> cleanups is growing rapidly. These So what is the truth? What can we objectives identified in their respective <br /> statistics also reflect the vast potential reasonably expect from a technology RODS, and numerous RCRA and state <br /> this technology has for cleaning up that some view as a panacea for all regulated closures also have been com- <br /> some of our nation's environmental environmental problems, while others pleted. <br /> problems, see it as an idea whose time has not yet What does this mean? Certainly it <br /> But bioremediation proponents have come? means we have to start thinking about <br /> not yet succeeded in convincing skep- This article attempts to clarify some bioremediation as a technology that <br /> tics about the future success of biotech- of the myths and misconceptions about has left the laboratory for,4he field- As <br /> nology. primarily because so many bioremediation and discusses its discussed earlier, it is estimated that <br /> myths and misconceptions surround potential for future cleanup projects. more than 250 potential bioremedia- <br /> its use.While bioremediation has come ,Myth No. 1 -- The technology is tion projects are being considered.The <br /> a long way, many people still express experimental and not ready to take to the continued on page 24 <br /> i <br /> M. AV 1Q(" <br />