Laserfiche WebLink
(44 ug/kg). Laboratory analyses of soil samples for oth r constituents of concern included PCB's <br /> (below detection limits). Maximum metal concentrations in the soil were reported as follows: <br /> hexavalent chrome (below detection limit); cadmium (below detection limit); lead (14 mg/kg); <br /> nickel (6 mg/kg); zinc (170 mg/kg); and chrome III (10 mg/kg). <br /> i <br /> I <br /> PHSEHD has named Henry Hansen as a Responsible Party for the identified soil hydrocarbon <br /> contamination associated with the former underground storage tank at the subject property. <br /> PHSEHD has required Henry Hansen to conduct a limited followup sampling by a single soil <br /> boring site immediately under the former UST location to determine the vertical extent of <br /> hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> Current Soil Sampling Results <br /> I <br /> Exploratory soil boring HH-SB 1 was located immediately over the former waste oil UST <br /> location (Exhibit 3). This soil boring was advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 drill rig with a <br /> continuous hollow stem flite auger. The drilling contractor was Earthtec Ltd, Roseville, <br /> California. HH-SB-1 was started, sampled, and compl ted on June 16, 2000. Drilling and soil <br /> sampling was conducted under the oversight of this off ce by a State of California Certified <br /> Engineering Geologist. <br /> The soil flite augers were steam cleaned prior to use in a hole. Soil samples were collected <br /> every five feet by a modified California split-spoon sampler using 2 '/z inch diameter brass <br /> sleeves. All sampling equipment was decontaminated by Alquinox prior to sampling. The first <br /> sample was collected at a depth of 6.0 to 6.5 feet belo ground surface. A total of eight soil <br /> samples were collected with total depth reached at 41.5 feet below ground surface. All cuttings <br /> were drummed in a 55 gallon DOT drum and left onsite. <br /> The lithologies penetrated were primarily brown to dark brown, medium to coarse grained sand, <br /> dry, and micaceous. No indication of proximity to thegroundwater table was found to be <br /> present. No odor or hydrocarbon staining was found tc be present in the cuttings. <br /> A total of eight soil samples were collected from the soil boring. The soil boring was backfilled <br /> with bentonite chips to within 10 feet of the surface an backfilled with native soil. <br /> All eight soil samples were submitted to KIFF Analytical, Davis, California under chain of <br /> custody documentation. Two soil samples, SB-1-11. -11.5, and SB-1 -16.0- 16.5 were <br /> analyzed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( SEPA)Test Method 8260B and other <br /> scans. <br /> Specific scans requested by PHSEHD included TPH-g soline, BTEX, 7 oxygenates, and volatile <br /> halocarbons. All analytical results were reported below laboratory detection limits. In addition, <br /> PHSEHD requested a wet extraction test (WET) for led and a scan for Chrome III. Both lead <br /> 3 <br />