Laserfiche WebLink
w <br /> POM Bic�si ste n15 <br /> Page 15 <br /> August 10, 1985 <br /> Job No. 211-71-6 <br /> _ After the screened portion of the well casing was backfilled with filter sand, the hole was sealed <br /> from possible surface water contamination with a 2-foot thick bentonite 1'lug and then backfilled <br /> to within a few inches of the surface with cement grout containing about 5 percent bentonite. The <br /> grouting of the wells was witnessed by a representative of the County of San Joaquin Local Health <br /> District. Monitoring weli;m—w 15 thrw,gh MW-25 were finished with watertight, security traffic <br /> boxes and locking steel cc-ers set in concrete or lacking well caps. The traffic boxes were typica IIy <br /> set about an inch above the existing ground surface Io help divert surface water away from the well. <br /> Each weli ;s equipped with a watertight cap. <br /> Well Development and Water Sam lin <br /> The monitoring wets(2 inch in diameter)were developed by using a 1.7-inch O.D.stainless steel <br /> bailer to surge the water around the screened interval and remove fine particles from the vicinity <br /> of the screen casing. The water was purged from the wells until the water was relatively free of <br /> turbidity. All well development equipment was steam-cleaned between wells. The water obtained . <br /> from well development was placed in ]wf-.eled 55-9allor, drums for temporary storage or-site. <br /> Prior to purging, each well was measured using an.interface probe and then sampled with a clear <br /> teflon bailer in order to <br /> • observe the possible presence of floating <br /> hydrocarbons. The welts were <br /> purged using a 1.7-inch O.D. stainless steel ba;'er until pH and conductivity measurements <br /> p <br /> stabilized. This typically resnIted in the removal of 3 to 5 welt volumes of water. Prior to each <br /> sampling the bailer was washed with acetone or methanol,and then a triso(4ium phosphate soNtion, <br /> and finally rinsed with potable water. New bailer line was used for each sampling. Samples <br /> recovered from each well were decanted into two appropriately prepared 40-m! vol,tie organic <br /> analysis(VOA) bottles. Care was taken to avoid the presence of a headspace:n any of the sample <br /> bottles. The sample bottles were immediately plzced in an ice chest and maintained at 4°C for <br /> delivery to the State of California licensed Trace Analytical laboratory(Hayward). Routine chain- <br /> of-custody procedures were employed. <br /> Groun3-Wr.ter Gradient Determination <br /> 1 The most recent static water leve!elevations from the monitoring wells were obtained an Jure 19, <br /> 1989. Top of casing elevations and ground surface elevations were surveyed (to the nearest 0.01 <br /> foot) for MW-1 through MVI--25 by Liu Pont Biosystems. The datum survey used was a City of <br /> Lodi brass disc benchmark(51.70 feet MSL)located on the curb of South Cheroke..e bane,near the <br /> southwest corner of the property(see the Site Pin,Figure 2).. The depth to water was measured <br /> - using a Solinst electric immersion probe and/or an interface probe. <br /> i <br />