Laserfiche WebLink
---mm - <br /> ME <br /> F _ <br /> t <br /> kw <br /> Page 6 <br /> February 6, 1990 <br /> Job No.21.-71-6 <br /> i <br /> Mokelump River,which is located about 13/4:Hiles to the north, and a number of percolation basins and the <br /> South Main Canal,which are looted about 13/4 miles to the west. <br /> In the Lodi area,the large production water wells are screened within the alluvial deposits,the Victor Formation, <br /> and the Laguna Formation. The overall permeability of these units is considered fairly high (CDWR, 1967). <br /> Sand and gravel deposits have the highest transmissivities and are the main water-bearing units;the silt and clay <br /> layers generally have lower transmissivities. Ground waEpr in this area is generally unconfined or semi-confined <br /> (CDWR, 1967). <br /> The elevation of ground water is shown to be at approximately mean sea Ievel (MSL) near the site, according <br /> -- to the Regional Ground-Water Map(Fire 4). This map was prepared by the California Department of Water <br /> — Resources for water levels measured during the sPrirg of 1980- Earlier potentiometric maps for 1950 and 1964 <br /> shod'the ground-water elevation in the site vicinity to be IU feet MSL and 0 feel MSL,respectively. These three <br /> California Department oy Water Resources maps show the regional ground-water gradient ec the site is directed <br /> to the south, towards the City of Stockton where the ground water is subjected to extensive pumping and <br /> withdrawal (CDWR, 1967). <br /> `" INSTAI.LATTON OF RECOVERY WELL RW-I PHASE I <br /> Recovery well R-1 was drilled on November 17, 1989 by West Hazmat Drilling Corporation at the location shown <br /> on Figure 2. The well was completed to a depth of 8o feet using 6-inch diameterschedule 40 PVC casing and <br /> r. -inch slot. The well log is presented in Appendix A. The well instaUa;ion <br /> TTMCO High Flow Screen"'with 0.02 <br /> and seal was witnessed by Ms. Eleanor Ratliff of the San Joaquin County Public Health Services. <br /> Soil samples were collected during dritling by continuous coring. Soil samples were visually classified by a Du <br /> Pont Environmental Services Registered Geologist using the Unified Sail Classification System (USCS,ASTM <br /> D-2487-85)- Soil samples from above the water table were collected at 5-foot intervals and field tested for volatile <br /> organic vapors using an OVM. The results of the field organic vapor measurements are included on the well fog ti <br /> (Appendix A). Based on the field organic vapor measurements, soil samples were selecied for laboratory <br /> analysis, the results of which are summarized in Table A. <br /> The soils encountered during the drilling of recovery well RW-1 consisted of interbedded units of At,sand,sandy <br /> silt,clayey silt,and silty clay. Free ground water was encountered at approximately 62 feet below grade during <br /> drilling. <br /> Recovery well RW-1 was developed on November 29, 1989 by Kvilhaug Wel!Drilling and Pump Company. The <br /> well was surged and pumped for extended periods of time until the purged water was relatively clear and free <br /> of turbidity. All purge water was contained on-site in a Baker Tank which was also used to store the discharge <br /> water produced dur;ng the aquifer test performed on well RW-I. <br /> Du Pont.Environmental Services �, <br />