Laserfiche WebLink
r� <br /> r <br /> t. <br /> .5 <br /> Project 02260.01 November 20, I990 <br /> The temporary vacuum probes installed for the investigation were <br /> constructed of 1/2-inch diameter schedule 40 steel pipe. A point was <br /> forged on one end of each probe. A 48-inch range of 3/16-inch <br /> perforations were drilled into each probe beginning at 3 inches from the <br /> paint (Figure A). The vacuum probes were driven pneumatically into the <br /> soil to various depths (Table I). In locations where the soil was <br /> -- covered by concrete or asphalt, a I-inch diameter hole was drilled <br /> through the surface material with an electric roto-hammer to facilitate <br /> probe installation. <br /> �. After installation, a vacuum was applied to each probe or well to extract <br /> soil gas. One psi sample pressure was maintained during the analysis. <br /> Sample flow rate and instrument pressures were checked before each test. <br /> The soil gas was sampled through a 1/4-inch Teflon sample line that was <br /> connected to a stainless steel well head fitting. Use of Teflon tubing <br /> minimizes sample loss through adsorption and the possibility of distorted <br /> results from a sample line contaminated by a previous analysis. <br /> - Leak checks were performed on the sample line before the analysis. <br /> Filters were used extensively throughout the system to remove foreign <br /> material from the sample pathway. The sample line was connected to a <br /> diaphragm pump located in a mobile laboratory. The extracted soil gas <br /> was analyzed using a Beckman Model 400 Total Hydrocarbon Analyzer <br /> equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector (FID). The Beckman Model 400 <br /> was calibrated using certified standards of propane in nitrogen. The <br /> instrument was recalibrated periodically throughout the day using <br /> certified standards. <br /> Depen to groundwater was measured in all monitoring wells tested during <br /> the Soil Gas Survey using an electronic water level indicator. <br /> Performance Test <br /> The Performance Test was conducted on november 7, 1990. A portable skid <br /> containing a vacuum pump, flow meters, and vacuum gauges was used on <br /> T site. A vacuum line was connected to a temporary vacuum probe or <br /> existing groundwater monitoring well to create an extraction point. <br /> Three monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-8, and MW-I0) and two vacuum probes (P-I <br /> and P-5) were used as extraction points (Figure 1). Each extraction <br /> point was tested for 20 minutes with the exception of MW-10, which was <br /> tested for 30 minutes. Upwelling of the water table was monitored at <br /> each monitoring well extraction point during testing using a water level <br /> indicator. <br /> -- <br /> 2 <br />