My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 2002 - 2013
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 2002 - 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 2:57:40 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 2:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2013
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page I of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:24 PM <br /> To: 'rmarty@advgeoenv.com' <br /> Subject: RE: Cherokee <br /> sounds like we're on the same page. <br /> Bill and I just spoke on the phone.. <br /> you resubmit to GT the plan:. <br /> I'll hold off on any compliance stuff... <br /> just get it to me in June....08 I.... <br /> I <br /> From: Robert Marty [mai Ito:rmarty@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:14 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: 'bill'; 'Lauren Cardinalli'; 'Art Deicke' <br /> Subject: RE: Cherokee <br /> I understand completely; you and I spoke of this and you were clear. And, I agreed with you. an <br /> fact, I spoke to Bill and I want to submit a revised plan consisting of one extraction well and <br /> j possibly two other "observation"wells (that can be used :for extraction later; as you :mention. <br /> below—one shallow, one deep). <br /> i <br /> Lauren has been in the field;I was out in Santa Rosa yesterday, so she and 1.have not connected <br /> yet. :But I briefed her on the phone. <br /> A :revised plan (much more abridged) is being prepared. We all agree that the soil is tight and the <br /> contamination is mostly diesel.—though there are likely other, :remnant constituents present. <br /> However, we would still like to do a very limited pilot test using h.i.gh. vacuum. Excavation just <br /> doesn't seem like the right choice there would be an extreme amount of overburden that would <br /> have to be dealt with AND it would severely disrupt site operations. I'm not a fan.of the big dig at <br /> this site — co:ntatnination is also very, very deep. Now,being diesel, the first choice would be <br /> closure - but I'm quite certain.that closure with no remediation would be rejected by you and the <br /> Board. <br /> In any case, I really believe that HVVE has a shot here. That's why we want the test. <br /> The revised plan will do our best to justify the test. And;the test will be limited in .its scope <br /> (number of wells) and time. , <br /> Thanks, . <br /> Robert E. Marty, R.E.A. I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> Stockton • Santa Rosa •:Monterey • Brea <br /> 1-800-51.1-9300 <br /> nn arty@advgeo en v.com <br /> www.advgeoenv.coni - <br /> This email/.fax message is for the sol6 use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged <br /> 6/27/2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.