My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001921
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 3:57:23 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 3:08:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001921
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s - <br /> _ - <br /> r <br /> F Y 1 r <br /> 16 August 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0312 <br />' Page 13 of 20 <br />' 7 4 NO FURTHER ACTION <br /> A final potential alternative,,"no further action", may be appropriate for the site A "no further <br />' action" recommendation would be made based on the following <br /> • The majority of contamination found at the site is composed of longer chain hydrocarbons <br />' which generally migrate at a very slow rate <br /> • The predominant soil types found at the site Include silt and clay which tend to prevent, or <br />' at least greatly retard,vertical and horizontal migration of contaminants thereby limiting the <br /> threat of a significant impact to ground water <br /> •, The most intensely impacted soil is confined to the upper twenty-five feet of soil <br />' Historically, ground water has not been higher than 45 feet bsg and has been as great as <br /> 94 5 feet bsg, creating a 20-foot or more buffer zone between high concentrations of the <br />' relatively immobile contaminants and ground water ` <br /> Minor costs would be associated with the "no further action" alternative, for instance the <br /> monitoring wells on site may need to be abandoned <br /> I• <br />' 8.0. GROUND WATER REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> Three methods believed to be most arneudbie Lo rernediation of hydrocarbon-impacteu ground eater <br />'= on the site have been evaluated The methods include ground water extraction (pump and treat), <br /> bioremediation and natural attenuation In addition, a "no further action" scenario has been <br /> evaluated <br /> , <br /> 8 1 GROUND WATER EXTRACTION <br />' There are several different methods for treatment of extracted8T ound water,which are collectively <br /> called "pump and treat" All methods of pump and treat involve extraction and transfer of <br />' contaminated ground water from the aquifer to an above-ground treatment or disposal/recycling <br /> facility The extraction is performed using an automatic pump system to establish and maintain <br />' contaminant capture characteristics in the aquifer and to assure that process volume requirements <br /> are maintained After treatment, the water can be discharged into a storm-drain or sanitary sewer A <br /> waste discharge permit would be required for discharge <br /> 1 , <br /> 1 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.