My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001921
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 3:57:23 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 3:08:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001921
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> w <br /> 16 August 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0312 <br />' Page 18 of 20 <br />' 8 3 4 Estimated Costs <br /> It is likely that some additional laboratory analysis of ground water samples would be required to <br /> x <br /> monitor and verify natural attenuation A long-term monitoring program, ranging perhaps from 10 <br /> to 25 years, may be necessary Quarterly monitoring and sampling could cost between $5,000 to <br />' $15,000 annually, report preparation could cost between$4,000 to $6,000 annually Therefore,the <br /> total cost for natural attenuation could range from $9,000 to $21,000 annually <br /> 8 4 NO FURTHER ACTION <br />' Another alternative,the"no further action"alternative,maybe appropriate for the site A"no further <br /> action" recommendation would be made based on the following <br />' • Impacted ground water at the site is limited Samples collected from the two domestic wells <br /> located at the site have not contained confirmed detectable concentration of the constituents <br />' of concern <br /> o Contaminant concentrations have declined significantly in UST-1 and have remained <br />' relatively stable in the other five monitoring wells Samples collected from perimeter wells <br /> contained concentrations that have consistently been below detectable levels <br /> No cost would be associated with Lhe "no further aWon" alternative <br /> I9.0. RECOMMENDATIONS r <br /> AGE has evaluated three methods to remediate hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water on the <br /> I <br /> subject site and discussed no further action as a fourth alternative 'In view of site specific conditions, <br /> the principles of the remedial methods,the advantages and disadvantages of each,remedial method <br /> and AGE's experience with each method,AGE recommends that impacted soil acid ground water at <br /> the site be addressed as described below <br />' 9 1 REMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL <br /> 1 <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil in the vadose zone appears to be limited to the area containing <br /> soil borings B16, UST-3, B28, B6, B23, B8, B27, B22, B29, B13, UST-2, B5, B3 and B25 "The <br /> • plume of impacted soil at the site has an estimated northeast-southwest diameter of approximately <br /> 180 feet, an northwest-southeast diameter of approximately 70 feet and appears to extend locally <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> I <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.