My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001921
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 3:57:23 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 3:08:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001921
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i i i a i i i i i i i i i � �■ �■ �■ � � <br /> TABLES <br /> SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> Cherokee Truck Stop <br /> 3535 East Cherokee Road, Stockton, California <br /> u <br /> Hslirvood Costa{mrd 1'j Z l�itclfu2g 1<& t rated <br /> M�csd Advantages l�isailvarttag�,� l�ttitiito�ng and Requtreri�t►t� l�i��� <br /> cavation •Theoretical removal of 100%of •Cost-effectiveness decreases with depth of $600,000 to$750,000 Monitoring of 1 month for ' <br /> contaminants•Relatively short contamination•Cannot cleanup under for excavation,disposal excavated soil, excavation and <br /> ection 71 remediation period•Effective structures•Excavated soil must be treated or and backfill-does not collection of soil disposal,6 to 12 „ <br /> remediation of all soil types disposed•Backfill material and compaction include disruption to samples upon months if soil <br /> costs can be excessive•Disruption of day to business or building completion of treatment is , <br /> day business,unacceptable to client and demolition/repair excavation required <br /> r tenant - <br /> I <br /> n-situ •Relatively simple design and •Regulatory approval can be difficult to $120,000 to$235,000 Monthly monitoring or 36 to 48 months <br /> Bioremediation operation•Works well in most soil obtain•Additional inoculations and nutrient total cost organic vapor,carbon <br /> types where no biotoxicity is present supplementation sometimes necessary•Less dioxide and dissolved <br /> ecnon 7 2 effective in soils with high concentrations of 1 1 oxygen,quarterly <br /> hydrocarbons,low nutrients or low%of ground water/soil <br /> hydrocarbon biodegiaders - sample collection <br /> - atwul •Lower costs than most active •Not effective for higher contaminant $11,000 to$22,000 Installation of unknown , <br /> ttenuation r remedial alternatives•Minimal concentrations•Migration of contamination annually additional borings, <br /> - disturbance to the site•Potential use may occur•Longer time frarne than active Ground water <br /> _ ectron 7 3 below structures remediation•May not achieve cleanup levels monitoring <br /> within reasonable length of time-Less <br /> effective in soils with high concentrations of <br /> hydrocarbons,low nutrients or low%of <br /> hydrocarbon biodegraders <br /> o Further Action •No disturbance to the site•Very •Migration of contamination may occur• No cost - None not applicable <br /> low cost Significant time required to achieve cleanup <br /> ectron 7 4 levels <br /> k , <br /> + 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.