Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Maurice Benson <br /> March 12, 2009 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 7. Appendix B, Section 5.0, Implications, Paragraph 2; The aquifer test results data <br /> provided in Table 3-3 do not support the statement "...that most dieldrin in the <br /> NWC plume is comprised entirely of dieldrin sorbed to particles greater than <br /> 0.45 pm in size and, therefore, less susceptible to removal by pumping. Filtered <br /> groundwater samples (<0.45 Nm) from EW056A, LM190A, LM191A, and <br /> LM141AU all showed steady with increasing trends towards the end of the tests, <br /> further demonstrating the NWC dieldrin's ease of mobility, and sustainable <br /> extraction especially in areas where high dieldrin mass is still located. (See <br /> attached figures). <br /> 8. Appendix B, Section 5.0, Implications, Paragraph 3; The Section states that <br /> water levels observed during pumping never stabilized possibly due to <br /> dewatering effects from localized or regional pumping influences, yet there is no <br /> discussion of possible influences presented in this section, or the groundwater <br /> performance evaluation and hydraulic data report sections. The feasibility study <br /> should be amended to possibly identify these mentioned pumping influences to <br /> better understand the other mechanisms which may have influenced the mass <br /> removal testing results. <br /> 9. Section 8.0, Table 8-1, Screening of Groundwater Remediation Technologies <br /> and Process Options; The process options Groundwater Use Restrictions and <br /> Groundwater Monitoring under the General Response of Land Use Controls do <br /> not realistically account for the groundwater rights or access rights to the offsite <br /> property owned by the Alvarez family. Access and groundwater rights to the <br /> private land would be required as a component of the land use controls <br /> specifically allowing for sampling of compliance monitoring point(s) and ensuring <br /> that no wells are installed adjacent to the DDJC-Tracy northwestern property <br /> boundary to eliminate the potential mobility of dieldrin by localized pumping <br /> influences. <br /> The results from the mass removal test data coupled with the Theis Groundwater <br /> Analysis prepared by DTSC's Geologic Services Unit (GSU) Modeler indicates <br /> that.a border zone encompassing the existing dieldrin plume is needed toIensure <br /> that no pumping influences are installed or operated in relative proximity of the <br /> existing plume to eliminate the potentially mobility of the NWC dieldrin plume. <br /> The actual distances provided in the border zone should be determined based on <br /> fieldwork data, supported by modeling and monitoring results. <br /> 10. Section 8.0, Table 8-1, Screening of Groundwater Remediation Technologies <br /> and Process Options, In-situ Treatment; While literature primarily states that <br />