Laserfiche WebLink
9: , 11: 16 $115 7191' EPd Hrf • <br /> 2002 <br /> r <br /> S �iYf► ` UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY <br /> REGION rX <br /> 75 Hawthome Street <br /> San Francisco, Ca. 94105-3907 <br /> Dccembcr 4, 1992 <br /> Marshall CIoad <br /> Environmental Protection Office <br /> Building 231, Tracy Location <br /> Defense Distribution Region West <br /> P.O. Boz 96000I . <br /> Stockton, CA 95296-0250 <br /> RE: DDRW-Ti3cy's Request for EPA Position on Inclusion of San Joaquin County in <br /> CERCLA Process <br /> Dear Marshall, <br /> EPA is in receipt of DDRW-Tracy's letter, from Lt. Col. John L. Marshall, dated <br /> November 24, 1992 requesting an EPA °position statement' on the request of the San <br /> Joaquin County Public licalth Service/Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) to be <br /> included in the CERCLA process at DDRW-Tracy. Per vour request, EPA is providing our <br /> response by December 4, 199E <br /> EPA finds San Joaquin County's request to be kept informed of groundwater <br /> sampling acrivitics to be reasonable and consistent with CERCLA §I20(f) which states in <br /> part: <br /> each department, agency, or instrumentality responsible for compliance with this <br /> section shall afford to relevant State and local officials the opportwaty to <br /> participate in the plantung and selection of the remedial action including bra not <br /> Limited to the reoiew of all applicable data as it becomes available and the <br /> development of studies, reports and action plans' <br /> Options for affording San Joaquin County PHS/EHD appropriate opportunity, per <br /> §120, in addition to being provided copies of aII relevant documents, could include, but arc <br /> not necessarily limited to: <br /> • participation in the remedial project mana.acr meetings, and <br /> • inclusion in the development of, and membership 1n (a customary means of <br /> County,involvemcnt), the Technical Review Committee (TRC). <br /> The level of County participation should generally be determined by the level of <br /> County interest,with as understanding that the County's role in the CERCLA process <br /> should not impinge upon State/EPA/DDRW-Tracy roles, authorities and responsibilities. It <br /> I <br /> Avued oot Rayded PaPff <br />