Laserfiche WebLink
Example 1• specific cria for shutting down individual <br /> extraction wells, including the number of <br /> Excerpt from a Conceptual Model consecutive monitoring events where cleanup <br /> levels must be achieved for attainment at a <br /> .. PCE concentrations in excess of 2,500 ug/L have particular well and consideration of potential <br /> persisted in shallow well MW-12S since the remedial contaminant rebound <br /> investigation,despite pumping from the underlying but <br /> adjacent deep extraction well EW-2. This persistence <br /> may indicate the possible presence of a continuing PCE process monitoring levels or other milestones <br /> source(NAPL or soil contamination)near MW-12S. that will indicate when individual components <br /> Furthermore,little drawdown is noted at MW-12S, of the above-ground treatment process can be <br /> despite pumping from EW-2. The lack of draw down at removed <br /> MW-12S due to pumping at EW-2 calls into question the <br /> ability of EW-2 to capture the PCE in the shallow zone in Revise Goals Over Time As Appropriate <br /> the vicinity of MW-12S and may indicate that EW-2 is in <br /> a low conductivity zone or that a low conductivity layer There are many reasons to consider revising goals of <br /> separates EW-2 and MW-12S.... the P&T system over time, some of which are <br /> Data Gaps: highlighted in Exhibit 2. <br /> presence of a continuing PCE source <br /> degree of capture near MW-12S Because the site-specific conceptual model evolves, <br /> periodic review of system goals should occur on a <br /> Considerations for the Site-Wide Exit Strategy: regular basis,perhaps once every 5 years. For <br /> contain shallow ground water near MW-12S by Superfund sites,this review of system goals could be <br /> pumping(short term) done with the Five Year Review process. In some <br /> characterize and then remove or contain the federal and state programs,a change in the site <br /> continuing PCE source decision document may be needed prior to changing <br /> the goals. <br /> Include Metrics For Evaluating System Performance C. EVALUATING PERFORMANCE AND <br /> EFFECTIVENESS OF THE P&T SYSTEM <br /> To help determine whether or not the system goals are <br /> achieved,each goal should include metrics (i.e., <br /> performance standards that can be measured). For Evaluation of P&T system performance should <br /> example,a goal of"ground water containment' is include evaluation of the subsurface perforniance, <br /> vague unless stated in conjunction with specific metrics offered by the extraction system,and evaluation of the <br /> such as gradients, drawdowns,or ground water above-ground performance, offered by the treatment <br /> elevations ("water levels") that must be achieved at <br /> specific locations. Similarly, metrics for"ground water Exhibit 2 <br /> cleanup"might include specific milestones for mass Some Reasons To Modify Goals of the <br /> removal,peak concentration reduction, and/or plume P&T System <br /> area reduction that must be achieved within specified <br /> time periods or at specified locations. revised regulatory framework <br /> Clearly Indicate When Some or All of the P&T new treatment technologies or strategies <br /> System Can Be Discontinued <br /> operating experience suggests existing goals are <br /> unrealistic and will not be met <br /> To provide a viable exit strategy for the P&T system or <br /> some of its components,the following details or costs are greater than originally anticipated <br /> metrics should be specified as part of the system goals: <br /> changes in plume extent <br /> • contaminants of concern (CDCs)being <br /> addressed by the P&T system, which may be a discovery of additional and/or continuing sources of <br /> subset of the COCs for the entire site contamination,such as soil contamination or NAPL <br /> • cleanup levels that must be achieved for each changes in land use or ground water production near <br /> specific COC addressed by the P&T system the system <br /> 3 <br />