Laserfiche WebLink
equation,the pumping rate (Q)required for a desired vertical flow. Thus information from other lines of <br /> width of capture(W) can be estimated. The pumping evidence may be required. <br /> rate required for a given capture width must generally <br /> be higher than estimated by this equation to account for Ground Water Elevation Pairs. In some cases, pairs <br /> recharge and uncertainties in the other parameters. of ground water elevation measurements on either side <br /> Similarly, actual capture width for a specified pumping of a boundary can be used to demonstrate inward flow <br /> rate will typically be less than estimated by this relative to that boundary. An example might be <br /> equation for the same reasons. ground water elevation measurements on either side of <br /> property boundary or on either side of a slurry wall. <br /> This approach for idealized situations can and should Another example would be stage measured in a creek <br /> be used as a rudimentary analysis of ground water flow relative to the ground water elevation in the aquifer <br /> at a site. However, the simplifying assumptions and immediately adjacent to the creek. A higher creek <br /> resulting limitations should be understood and stage indicates no discharge from the aquifer to the <br /> specified. The limitations of this approach strongly creek. Because flow between the creek and aquifer can <br /> indicate a need for considering additional lines of change magnitude and even direction with changes in <br /> evidence for evaluating capture. precipitation and recharge, frequent measurements <br /> from these locations may be required. Ground water <br /> Potentionretr•ic Surface Maps. Ground water elevation elevation pairs from different levels of the aquifer can <br /> measurements can be used to create potentiometric also be used to verify vertical gradients that are <br /> surface maps, from which ground water flowlines and indicative of capture. Generally, it is important to <br /> the capture zone can be interpreted. Unfortunately,the exclude ground water elevations from active pumping <br /> number of ground water elevation measurements wells and to consider recent recharge events. <br /> typically available is not sufficient to unambiguously <br /> interpret capture. It is important to exclude ground Sentinel Wells. If capture is adequate,monitoring <br /> water elevation data from active pumping wells when wells downgradient of the extraction system(i.e., <br /> constructing potentiometric surface maps because they sentinel wells)can be monitored over time as follows: <br /> are influenced by well losses and are not representative <br /> of aquifer conditions. Note that when potentiometric Sentinel wells that are not currently impacted <br /> surface maps indicate capture with respect to horizontal by contaminants should remain without <br /> flow,capture may not be adequate with respect to impacts over time. <br /> Exhibit 4 Sentinel wells that are currently impacted by <br /> Width of Capture Zone and Flow Budget For contaminants should reach background levels <br /> over time. If concentrations decrease in these <br /> Very Simple Hydrogeologic Systems wells but remain over regulatory standards, <br /> Assumptions: capture provided by the extraction system is <br /> • one well likely inadequate. <br /> • single layer of constant thickness <br /> • homogeneous, isotropic aquifer Because ground water flow is slow, impacts at sentinel <br /> • no recharge from above or below wells may take years to appear, and concentration <br /> Q measurements over time at sentinel wells can become <br /> W= very costly. Interpretation may be ambiguous if the <br /> C X B X K X i sentinel wells are actually located within the zone of <br /> capture or if they are not in the correct locations to <br /> or detect uncaptured portions of a plume. Also, if the <br /> plume is not well delineated,portions of the plume <br /> Q= W x C x B x K x i may have previously migrated beyond the capture <br /> zone and the sentinel wells. These limitations of <br /> Q=extraction rate(gpm) sentinel wells emphasize the importance of using <br /> C=conversion factor(0.00518 gal/ftmin/day) multiple lines of evidence. For sites with fractured <br /> W=total width of capture zone upgmdient of the <br /> extraction system(ft) bedrock and/or highly heterogeneous conditions a <br /> B=saturated thickness(ft) greater density of sentinel monitoring points may be <br /> K=hydraulic conductivity(ft/day) merited due to the increased potential for preferential <br /> i=hydraulic gradient(ft/foot) pathways of contaminant migration. In addition,for <br /> sites with multiple layers or stratigraphic units with <br /> 5 <br />