My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 01 <br /> monitoring tracer concentrations in sentinel wells and manager and the site contractor. For facilitated <br /> tracer mass recovery in extraction wells over time. The review,the effluent sampling results should be <br /> presence of the tracer in sentinel wells indicates a lack presented alongside the discharge criteria. <br /> of capture,and a high mass recovery rate in extraction Exceedances should be highlighted and technical <br /> wells indicates a high degree of capture. The following explanations for the causes of the exceedances and the <br /> are some advantages of tracer tests: planned corrective action should be provided. <br /> • In fractured bedrock environments,tracers may Compare Design Parameters and Actual Parameters <br /> indicate flow along bedding planes and the for Treatment System <br /> connectivity of fractures between monitoring <br /> points. Because site conditions change over time and these <br /> changes can have implications on the cost and <br /> • A known mass of a tracer can be injected at a effectiveness of a remedy, P&T managers and their <br /> specified location and time,allowing mass contractors should routinely compare design values <br /> removal efficiency to be quantified. versus actual values for the following treatment <br /> process parameters: <br /> • Data from tracer tests can be used to calibrate <br /> ground water flow and contaminant transport influent flow rate to the treatment plant <br /> models. <br /> • influent concentrations for each contaminant <br /> • Depending on the tracer, sampling and analysis of concern <br /> can be relatively straightforward and low in <br /> cost if the proper sensors are available. contaminant mass loading to the treatment <br /> system(see Exhibit 5) <br /> However, tracer tests have the following disadvantages: <br /> • removal rates for the treatment system <br /> • Because the tracer is likely injected only at (influent mass minus effluent mass, or effluent <br /> select locations, demonstrating capture of the concentration divided by influent <br /> tracer does not confirm capture of the entire concentration) <br /> contaminant plume. <br /> • air to water ratio for an air stripper <br /> Injecting tracers may require obtaining an <br /> Underground Injection Control permit. pressure drop across granular activated carbon <br /> (GAC)units or filtration media <br /> • Due to the relatively slow movement of most <br /> ground water,tracer tests may take months or Addressing discrepancies between design and actual <br /> years to yield useful information. parameters can lead to changes that improve <br /> effectiveness and/or reduce O&M costs. Some <br /> PerformlInterpret Process Monitoring examples are provided in a later section of this fact <br /> sheet("Modify Inefficient System Components"). <br /> Process monitoring refers to measurements of Discrepancies between design and actual parameters <br /> concentrations in treatment plant influent and effluent, should be discussed with site contractors and <br /> and in some cases at intermediate points in the potentially with other technical assistance resources. <br /> treatment process. <br /> Evaluate Treatment System Components <br /> Verify that Discharge Standards are Being Achieved <br /> The performance of the treatment system and its <br /> Treated water from a P&T system must generally meet components can be evaluated by determining the mass <br /> appropriate standards prior to discharge. Fortunately, loading and removal rates. Especially during start up, <br /> most implemented treatment technologies have been determining the mass loading and removal rates for <br /> proven reliable through years of use in a variety of the individual treatment components may be merited. <br /> conditions,and treatment plants regularly meet the After system startup, however,these components <br /> discharge criteria. Nevertheless, sampling of plant should be operating reliably and evaluation of the <br /> effluent is recommended if not otherwise required, and treatment system as a whole(i.e., influent and effluent <br /> the resulting data should be scrutinized by both the site monitoring) should suffice. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.