My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluate Extraction Well Performance becomes operationar Specific capacity should then be <br /> measured regularly and a trend line plotted. The <br /> Extraction wells should be monitored to determine if average extraction rate should also be compared to the <br /> they are in the most effective location, given potential design extraction rate. If a decrease in specific <br /> changes in the contaminant plume,and also to capacity or the extraction rate of more than 10%is <br /> determine if they are performing as expected. noted, well-rehabilitation is likely required. In some <br /> cases, a well-maintenance program may need to be <br /> Evaluate Concentration Trends at Extraction Wells implemented. Note that for a well operating at a <br /> constant rate, drawdown trends provide the same <br /> As contaminant mass is extracted from the subsurface, information as specific capacity trends. For wells <br /> the contaminant concentrations in extraction wells where ground water elevations cannot be measured <br /> should decrease unless a continuing source of due to restrictions in access,measurement of the <br /> contaminant exists or contaminant levels have reached extraction rates will have to suffice (i.e., decreasing <br /> a plateau. If the contaminant concentration in an rate over time may indicate fouling). <br /> extraction well, or nearby monitoring wells,has <br /> decreased to low levels, then it may be more effective Regional changes in the ground water elevations due <br /> to shut down that extraction well, relocate it, or . to drought, recharge,or off-site pumping should be <br /> reallocate ground water extraction to other wells. considered by reviewing ground water elevation trends <br /> However, shutting down a well may not be possible if in nearby monitoring wells. Regional increases in <br /> that well is required for capture of the contaminant ground water elevations could mask a decrease in <br /> plume. If a well is shut down, monitoring should specific capacity, and regional decreases in ground <br /> continue for some period of time to ensure that water elevations could falsely suggest a decrease in <br /> concentrations do not"rebound"due to desorption of specific capacity. <br /> contaminants from soil to ground water,diffusion of <br /> contaminants from tighter portions of the formation,or A general guide to well maintenance developed by the <br /> additional dissolved contamination from continuing U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers (USACE)can be found <br /> sources. Monitoring ground water concentrations in in USACE Engineering Pamphlet EP 1110-1-27. <br /> individual extraction wells on an annual or semi-annual <br /> basis is likely sufficient for the above analyses. If Applicable, Evaluate Injection Well or Infiltration <br /> Gallery Performance <br /> Pumping Rates and/or Specific Capacity Versus Time <br /> If a system discharges treated water to the subsurface <br /> Bacterial growth and chemical deposits can lead to through injection wells or an infiltration gallery,the <br /> fouling of extraction wells. If addressed properly performance of these points should be monitored to <br /> through a well-maintenance or well-rehabilitation ensure fouling does not limit the discharge capacity, <br /> program, fouling can usually be mitigated. If well and therefore the capacity of the entire P&T system. <br /> fouling is left unattended, however,it may reach a <br /> point where well rehabilitation is infeasible and the Many of the same procedures for monitoring <br /> well will need to be reinstalled. extraction wells can be used to monitoring injection <br /> points. The discharge rate and the increase in ground <br /> In general,fouling blocks the well screen and provides water elevation within the wells or galleries are <br /> resistance to water entering the well. As a result,the measured rather than the extraction rate and the <br /> water level in the well decreases until there is a drawdown. <br /> sufficient hydraulic gradient directing water into the <br /> well to balance that being extracted by the pump or Increases in the water levels within the reinjection <br /> until the water level in the well drops below the pump. points,given a constant discharge, indicate either <br /> Fouling may therefore occur with no noticeable change regional increases in ground water elevation or fouling <br /> in the extraction rate until the pump shuts down. of the injection wells. Regional increases in the <br /> ground water elevation can be confirmed or rejected <br /> The best indicator of well fouling is the specific by reviewing ground water elevation trends in nearby <br /> capacity of the well,which is the extraction rate monitoring wells. If increases are not due to regional <br /> divided by the drawdown(note that the ground water influences a rehabilitation program may need to be <br /> elevation under both static and pumping conditions is implemented, and the treatment system should be <br /> required to calculate drawdown). A baseline level of reviewed for options to minimize solids in the <br /> specific capacity should be recorded when the well first effluent. <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.