Laserfiche WebLink
continued from page <br /> Figure <br /> National <br /> Contingency After DDJC-Tracy and the regulatory agencies <br /> reviewed and incorporated public comments on <br /> Criteria for t the Proposed Plan,DDJC-Tracy prepared the <br /> Remedial vesSitewide Comprehensive ROD. This ROD <br /> described the selected remedial activities that <br /> O Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment DDJC-Tracy would undertake at each of the <br /> 20 sites. The regulatory agencies(EPA, <br /> Addresses whether a remedy provides adequate DTSC and RWQCB)reviewed and approved <br /> protection of human health and the environment, <br /> and describes how risks posed through each the ROD,and It was signed in April 1998. <br /> exposure pathway are eliminated,reduced, Since that time,DDJC-Tracy has been using <br /> or controlled through treatment,engineering the ROD to guide its environmental program. <br /> controls,or institutional controls. <br /> The Sitewide Comprehensive ROD required <br /> © Compliance with Applicable or Relevant DDJC-Tracy to conduct certain additional <br /> and Appropriate Requirements A. investigations. As a result of these additional <br /> Addresses whether a remedy will meet all of the ARARs and federal studies,DDJC-Tracy now has more information <br /> sand state environmental guidelines and/orjustifies an ARAB waiver. than was available when the ROD was signed <br /> © Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence in 1998. This new information has led to a better <br /> understanding of site conditions,and DDJC-Tracy <br /> Refers to the ability of a remedy to maintain is recommending some new remedial actions that <br /> reliable protection of human health and the "MOMMOM <br /> differ from the actions listed in the ROD. For this <br /> environment over time,once cleanup goals have been met. reason,a ROD amendment is required. <br /> OReduction of ToAclty,Mobility,and Volume The Draft Final Amendment to the Sitewide <br /> Through Treatment Comprehensive Record of Decision(referred to <br /> hereafter as the ROD Amendment)was published <br /> Refers tothe anticipated ability of the treatment <br /> technologies to reduce the toxicity,mobility,and _ in November 2001.(The ROD Amendment will be <br /> volume(TMV)of the hazardous compounds �j._ published as a final document after comments have <br /> present at the site. been received from the public.)This new document <br /> explains what has been learned since the Sitewide <br /> Comprehensive ROD(referred to hereafter as the <br /> © Cost Evaluates the estimated capital and operation and _ original ROD)was published,and it recommends <br /> maintenance(O&M)costs for each alternative. new remedial actions to be taken as a result of <br /> the new information. <br /> 0 Short-Term Effectiveness <br /> The following sections provide details about three <br /> Addresses the period of time needed to achieve <br /> protection and any adverse impacts on human health �,,,a-�., sites that were affected by the new information, <br /> and the environment that may be posed during and about the criteria that were used to develop <br /> the constmction and implementation period, '�''' <br /> p p M•,..� recommendations for new remedial action <br /> until cleanup goals are achieved. —' <br /> alternatives at these three sites. <br /> O Implementability Figure 4 shows the location of all of the remedial <br /> action sites at DDJC-Tracy. The figure highlights <br /> Refers to the technical and administrative feasibility two of the sites addressed in the ROD Amendment <br /> of the remedy,including the availability of materials <br /> and services needed to implement a particular option. (shown in the figure as SWMU 4 and DSERTS 72). <br /> The groundwater treatment system shown in Figure <br /> 4 is part of the cleanup remedy for the third site <br /> addressed in the ROD Amendment. This third <br /> site,known as Operable Unit 1,consists of the <br /> 0 State Acceptance contaminated groundwater beneath DDJC-Tracy. <br /> Indicates whether the state favors or objects to any - <br /> of the alternatives based on the available information. i'uxsu <br /> 0 Community Acceptance <br /> Indicates whether community concerns are addressed by the remedy <br /> and whether the community has a preference for a remedy.Although <br /> public comment is an important part of the final decision,DLA must <br /> balance community concerns with all the previously mentioned criteria. <br /> 4 <br />