Laserfiche WebLink
SWMU 4 (continued) lowOU 1 (continued) <br /> Evaluation and Selection of Preferred Alternative groundwater would be primarily discharged via injection <br /> The original ROD established three remedial action into shallow aquifers using the injection wells and infiltration:I <br /> objectives for SWMU 4: galleries(discharge structures consisting of below-ground <br /> Prevent the release from sediment of contaminants of ' G; gravel-filled trenches)located on the main depot property. <br /> concern(COCs)that could cause surface water concei <br /> r' trations to exceed federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria It has not been possible to implement fully the remedy as it <br /> for the protection of aquatic life; was intended in the ROD because the ROD significantly <br /> • Prevent ecological receptors from being exposed to COCs overestimated the capacity of the subsurface(soil and water <br /> above aquatic standards for surface water;and beneath the ground's surface)to accept the treated ground- <br /> • Prevent ecological receptors from being exposed to COCl water. Although additional infiltration galleries and <br /> in sediment. numerous injection wells have been installed at the site, <br /> it has not been possible to discharge sufficient water to <br /> The original ROD identified the following three remedi enable the extraction wells to operate properly to contain <br /> alternatives for meeting the objectives listed above: the plumes of groundwater contaminants. For this reason, <br /> •Alternative 1 —No Action; other options are necessary to supplement the subsurface <br /> •Alternative 2—Upstream Source Control;and discharge. <br /> •Alternative 3—Limited Excavation; Overflow Weir; <br /> Sediment Trap;and Stormwater Monitoring The proposed modification to the original ROD remedy <br /> is to add overland flow(surface discharge)as a supplemental <br /> The original ROD selected Alternative 3 as the alternative discharge system. <br /> that best met the remedial action objectives. <br /> Subsurface discharge is still preferred and will be used to <br /> The ROD Amendment proposes modifying Alternative 3 the extent possible. Use of both subsurface discharge and <br /> to remove the need for the limited excavation of sediments. overland flow will improve plume capture by allowing for <br /> The modified alternative is called Alternative 3a. Alternative full operation of the groundwater"pump and treat"system. <br /> 3a was evaluated against the NCP criteria listed in Figure 3, <br /> and Alternative 3a met all of these criteria. The evaluation DDJC-Tracy is preparing an application for the renewal <br /> found that although the original Alternative 3 may provide and revision of Waste Discharge Requirements(WDRs). <br /> some minimal improvement in long-term effectiveness, The WDRs must be revised before DDJC-Tracy can <br /> Alternative 3a has a significantly greater short-term discharge treated groundwater to the overland flow system. <br /> effectiveness and a much lower cost. For these reasons, Also,DDJC-Tracy is preparing an application for a <br /> Alternative 3a is preferred for implementation. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) <br /> permit to allow discharge of treated groundwater to the <br /> West Side Irrigation Ditch,which is maintained by the <br /> West Side Irrigation District. <br /> 01.111 The addition of a surface water discharge option would <br /> provide more operational flexibility,in case there is a <br /> The groundwater at DDJC-Tracy(known as OU 1)has been decrease in the capacity of the infiltration galleries or the <br /> affected by various contaminants. The presence of these overland flow system. To help maintain the maximum <br /> contaminants in groundwater is believed to be the result of beneficial use of treated groundwater,surface water <br /> past depot operations. The contaminated groundwater is discharge will be used only as a"last resort"option. <br /> present in a plume that is migrating off site from the depot <br /> toward the northeast. This plume of contamination is Evaluation and Selection of Preferred Alternative <br /> identified primarily by concentrations of certain volatile The original ROD established three remedial action <br /> organic compounds(VOCS);the VOCs of greatest objectives for OU 1: <br /> concern are the cleaning solvents trichloroethylene(TCE) • Remediate the areas containing the highest level <br /> and tetrachloroethylene(PCE). of contaminants; <br /> • Minimize transport of the COCs; and <br /> The original ROD selected a"pump and treat"cleanup • Remediate COCs to the levels agreed to in the ROD. <br /> remedy for OU 1 groundwater. This remedy consisted of <br /> groundwater extraction wells,two groundwater treatment In order to better achieve these remedial objectives,the <br /> plants that use an air stripping technique to remove VOCs, ROD Amendment proposes modifying the selected remedy <br /> wellhead carbon treatment to remove dieldrin(a pesticide), (extraction,treatment,and discharge to the subsurface)to <br /> and reinjection of the treated groundwater into injection include discharge via overland flow and potential discharge <br /> galleries. The original ROD specified that the treated to the West Side Irrigation District, continued on page 8 <br /> 7 <br />