Laserfiche WebLink
INITIAL RELEASE DDJC Tracy <br /> APPENDIX C: Estimated Exposures and Health Effects <br /> Estimates of Human Exposure Doses and Determination of Health Effects <br /> Deriving Exposures Doses <br /> ATSDR estimated the human exposure doses for the following pathways) ingestion of private <br /> well water; 2) incidental ingestion of Day Care Center's play yard surface soil by children; and 3) <br /> ingestion of fish from the stormwater lagoon. Deriving exposure doses requires evaluating the <br /> concentrations of the contaminants to which people may have been exposed and the frequency <br /> and duration of those exposures. Health effects are also related to individual characteristics—such <br /> as age, gender, and nutritional status—that influence how a chemical might be absorbed, <br /> metabolized, and eliminated by the body. Together, these factors help influence the individual's <br /> physiological response to chemical contaminant exposure and potential noncarcinogenic and <br /> carcinogenic health outcomes. In the absence of site-specific exposure information, ATSDR <br /> applied several conservative exposure assumptions to define sit-specific exposure as accurately as <br /> possible for residents near the DDJC Tracy site. <br /> Evaluating Potential Health Hazards <br /> The estimated exposure doses are used to evaluate potential noncancer and cancer effects <br /> associated with chemicals of concern. When evaluating noncancer effects, ATSDR uses standard <br /> health guidelines, including ATSDR's Minimal Risk Levels (MItLs) and EPA's Reference Doses <br /> (RfDs), to determine whether adverse effects will occur. The chronic MRLs and RfDs are <br /> estimates of daily human exposures to a substance that are unlikely to result in adverse noncancer <br /> effects over a specified duration. ATSDR compared estimated exposure doses associated with <br /> DDJC Tracy exposure scenarios to conservative health guidelines such as chronic MRLs or RfDs <br /> for each contaminant of concern, if available. If the exposure dose is greater than the MRI, or <br /> RfD, then a possibility exists that noncancer effects could occur. <br /> In general, MRLs and RfDs are based on levels of exposure reported in animal or human studies <br /> and consider the most sensitive outcome observed for oral or inhalation exposures. MRLs and <br /> RfDs are derived from the level at which no effects were observed in the study (i.e., the "no- <br /> observed-adverse-effects level" [NOAEL]) or the lowest level at which effects-are observed (i.e., <br /> the"lowest-observed-adverse-effects level" [IAAEL]). To derive the MILL, uncertainty(safety) <br /> factors are applied to the NOAELs or LOAELs to account for variation in the human population <br /> and the uncertainty involved in extrapolating from animal studies to reflect human exposures. <br /> C-1 <br />