My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:33:59 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HOW THE REMEDY IS SELECTED <br /> Each alternative was assessed against the nine EPA evaluation criteria <br /> described below. Using results of this assessment, DDRW-Tracy compared <br /> the alternatives and selected a preferred alternative for the site. The nine <br /> criteria are summarized below: <br /> 1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment: <br /> Addresses whether or not a remedy provides adequate protection and describes how risks <br /> posed through each pathway are eliminated, reduced or controlled through treatment, <br /> engineering controls or institutional controls. <br /> 2. Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements(ARARs): <br /> Addresses whether or not a remedy will meet all ARARs of Federal and Stale environmental <br /> statutes and/or provide grounds for invoking a waiver. <br /> 3. Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence: <br /> Refers to the ability of a remedy to maintain reliable protection of human health and the <br /> environment over time,once cleanup goals have been met. <br /> 4. Short-term Effectiveness: <br /> Addresses the period of time needed to complete the remedy,and any adverse impact on <br /> human health and the environment that may be posed during the construction and <br /> implementation period. <br /> 5. Reduction of Toxicity,Mobility and Volume Through Treatment: <br /> Refers to the anticipated ability of a remedy to reduce the toxicity,mobility and volume of <br /> hazardous components present at the site. <br /> 6. Implementability: <br /> Refers to the technical administrative feasibility of a remedy,including the availability of <br /> materials and services needed to carry out a particular option. <br /> 7. Cost: <br /> Evaluates the estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs of each alternative. <br /> 8. State Acceptance: <br /> Indicates whether,based on its review of the information,the State concurs with,opposes <br /> or has no comment on the preferred alternatives. <br /> 9. Community Acceptance: <br /> Indicates whether community concerns are addressed by the remedy and whether or not <br /> the community has a preference for a remedy. Although public comment is an important <br /> part of the final decision,EPA is compelled by law to balance community concerns with <br /> all of the previously mentioned criteria. <br /> Source: Modified from EPA <br /> Figure 3. THE NINE EPA EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> WM0 -5000/100792 <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.